121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38404083)
1. Bony lesion analysis in carcinoma prostate: methylene diphosphonate bone scan vs. Gallium-68 psma-11 pet/ct.
Ali H; Rashid Ul Amin S; Hai A; Nizar N
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2023; 35(3):415-418. PubMed ID: 38404083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone scintigraphy as a gatekeeper for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: comparison with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
Caglar M; Tuncel M; Yildiz E; Karabulut E
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 34(12):932-941. PubMed ID: 32975741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Head-To-Head Comparison of
Zhao G; Ji B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):386-395. PubMed ID: 35441529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5.
Lengana T; Lawal IO; Boshomane TG; Popoola GO; Mokoala KMG; Moshokoa E; Maes A; Mokgoro NP; Van de Wiele C; Vorster M; Sathekge MM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Oct; 16(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 30120038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic accuracy of
Daniels H; Gilbert R; Bonin L
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Sep; 54(3):545-555. PubMed ID: 37211439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of uptake time on image quality of [
van der Sar ECA; Viol SLM; Braat AJAT; van Rooij R; Lam MGEH; de Jong HWAM; de Keizer B
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7619-7628. PubMed ID: 37093883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography with Tc-99m MDP bone scan in prostate cancer patients.
Uslu-Beşli L; Sağer S; Akgün E; Asa S; Şahin OE; Demirdağ Ç; Güner E; Khosroshahi BR; Karayel E; Pehlivanoğlu H; Aygün A; Uslu İ; Talat Z; Sönmezoğlu K
Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 49(1):301-310. PubMed ID: 30761859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraindividual Comparison of
Rathke H; Afshar-Oromieh A; Giesel FL; Kremer C; Flechsig P; Haufe S; Mier W; Holland-Letz T; De Bucourt M; Armor T; Babich JW; Haberkorn U; Kratochwil C
J Nucl Med; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 29371410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective intra-individual comparison of [
Lawal IO; Mokoala KMG; Mahapane J; Kleyhans J; Meckel M; Vorster M; Ebenhan T; Rösch F; Sathekge MM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 48(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 32424485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does bone scintigraphy still have a role in the era of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer?
Simsek DH; Sanli Y; Civan C; Engin MN; Isik EG; Ozkan ZG; Kuyumcu S
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 34(7):476-485. PubMed ID: 32394269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total-Body
Pomykala KL; Czernin J; Grogan TR; Armstrong WR; Williams J; Calais J
J Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 61(3):405-411. PubMed ID: 31541035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra-individual comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography versus bone scan in detecting skeletal metastasis at prostate cancer diagnosis.
Shanmugasundaram R; Saad J; Heyworth A; Wong V; Pelecanos A; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Goolam AS; Khadra M; Kam J; Ko R; McCombie S; Varol C; Winter M; Mansberg R; Nguyen D; Bui C; Loh H; Le K; Roberts MJ
BJU Int; 2024 Feb; 133 Suppl 3():25-32. PubMed ID: 37943964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of 99mTc-PSMA scintigraphy versus 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the detection of metastatic prostate cancer and dosimetry analysis: a gamma-camera-based alternate prostate-specific membrane antigen imaging modality.
Singh B; Sharma S; Bansal P; Hooda M; Singh H; Parihar AS; Kumar A; Watts A; Mohan R; Singh SK
Nucl Med Commun; 2021 May; 42(5):482-489. PubMed ID: 33395191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Dyrberg E; Hendel HW; Huynh THV; Klausen TW; Løgager VB; Madsen C; Pedersen EM; Pedersen M; Thomsen HS
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 30132104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The meta-analysis of the effect of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT diagnosis of prostatic cancer compared with bone scan.
Zhao R; Li Y; Nie L; Qin K; Zhang H; Shi H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(15):e25417. PubMed ID: 33847640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective Comparison of PET Imaging with PSMA-Targeted
Rowe SP; Li X; Trock BJ; Werner RA; Frey S; DiGianvittorio M; Bleiler JK; Reyes DK; Abdallah R; Pienta KJ; Gorin MA; Pomper MG
J Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 61(2):183-188. PubMed ID: 31451492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone metastases in prostate cancer - Gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen or Fluorine 18 sodium fluoride PET/computed tomography - the better tracer?
Agrawal A; Natarajan A; Mithun S; Bakshi G; Joshi A; Murthy V; Menon S; Purandare N; Shah S; Puranik A; Choudhury S; Prakash G; Pal M; Maitre P; Prabhash K; Noronha V; Rangarajan V
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Dec; 43(12):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 36345767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Bone Uptake in Bone Scan and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT Images in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Acar E; Bekiş R; Polack B
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(6):589-594. PubMed ID: 32008568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
