These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study. Afrane S; Ampah JD; Agyekum EB; Amoh PO; Yusuf AA; Fattah IMR; Agbozo E; Elgamli E; Shouran M; Mao G; Kamel S Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model. Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sustainable municipal waste management strategies through life cycle assessment method: A review. Zhang J; Qin Q; Li G; Tseng CH J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112238. PubMed ID: 33714044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-criteria analysis for municipal solid waste management in a Brazilian metropolitan area. Santos SM; Silva MM; Melo RM; Gavazza S; Florencio L; Kato MT Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Oct; 189(11):561. PubMed ID: 29034409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. To dream or not to dream in Havana: multi-criteria decision-making for material and energy recovery from municipal solid wastes. Alfonso-Cardero A; Pagés-Díaz J; Kalogirou E; Psomopoulos CS; Lorenzo-Llanes J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(4):8601-8616. PubMed ID: 34767162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste. Kumar A; Samadder SR Waste Manag; 2017 Nov; 69():407-422. PubMed ID: 28886975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Municipal solid waste management: Identification and analysis of technology selection criteria using Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Shanta MH; Choudhury IA; Salman S Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e23236. PubMed ID: 38163177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review. Soltani A; Hewage K; Reza B; Sadiq R Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():318-28. PubMed ID: 25301545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel multi-criteria decision-making framework for selecting municipal solid waste management alternative with 2-dimensional uncertain linguistic sets. Che Y; Zhang X Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(45):68582-68599. PubMed ID: 35543779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of Life Cycle Framework for Municipal Solid Waste Management: a Circular Economy Perspective from Developing Countries. Peiris MTOV; Dayarathne GLN Circ Econ Sustain; 2022 Aug; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 35966039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multi-criteria analysis of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India and the UK. Yap HY; Nixon JD Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():265-77. PubMed ID: 26275797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel sustainable decision making model for municipal solid waste management. Hung ML; Ma HW; Yang WF Waste Manag; 2007; 27(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 16529920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Landfill site selection for sustainable solid waste management using multiple-criteria decision-making. Case study: Al-Balqa governorate in Jordan. Arabeyyat OS; Shatnawi N; Shbool MA; Shraah AA MethodsX; 2024 Jun; 12():102591. PubMed ID: 38357637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative strategies towards a sustainable municipal solid waste management system: A case study in Cairo. ElSaid S; Aghezzaf EH Waste Manag Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):995-1006. PubMed ID: 32364031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration of LCSA and GIS-based MCDM for sustainable landfill site selection: a case study. Mozaffari M; Bemani A; Erfani M; Yarami N; Siyahati G Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Mar; 195(4):510. PubMed ID: 36964894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An economic evaluation and assessment of environmental impact of the municipal solid waste management system for Taichung City in Taiwan. Chang YJ; Chu CW; Lin MD J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 May; 62(5):527-40. PubMed ID: 22696803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management. Jovanovic S; Savic S; Jovicic N; Boskovic G; Djordjevic Z Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):884-95. PubMed ID: 27354012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distributed mixed-integer fuzzy hierarchical programming for municipal solid waste management. Part II: scheme analysis and mechanism revelation. Cheng G; Huang G; Dong C; Xu Y; Chen J; Chen X; Li K Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar; 24(9):8711-8721. PubMed ID: 28210949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decision-making for the selection of different leachate treatment/management methods: the ANP and PROMETHEE approaches. Özdemir A; Özkan A; Günkaya Z; Banar M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jun; 27(16):19798-19809. PubMed ID: 32222918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]