These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38405645)

  • 1. Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Digital Models Formulated From Direct Intra-oral Scanning of Dental Arches in Comparison With Extra-oral Scanning of Poured Dental Models in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Reliability.
    Jaber ST; Hajeer MY; Alkhouli KW; Al-Shamak RM; Darwich KMA; Aljabban O; Alam MK; Kara-Boulad JM
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54869. PubMed ID: 38405645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conformity, reliability and validity of digital dental models created by clinical intraoral scanning and extraoral plaster model digitization workflows.
    Kirschneck C; Kamuf B; Putsch C; Chhatwani S; Bizhang M; Danesh G
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Sep; 100():114-122. PubMed ID: 29990644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity and Reliability of Intraoral and Plaster Models' Photographs in the Assessment of Little's Irregularity Index, Tooth Size-Arch Length Discrepancy, and Bolton's Analysis.
    Alrasheed WA; Owayda AM; Hajeer MY; Khattab TZ; Almahdi WH
    Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23067. PubMed ID: 35308184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The precision of two alternative indirect workflows for digital model production: an illusion or a possibility?
    Elkersh NM; Fahmy RA; Zayet MK; Gaweesh YS; Hassan MG
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3787-3797. PubMed ID: 37046002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
    Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the fused deposition modeling and the digital light processing techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy of printing dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners.
    Jaber ST; Hajeer MY; Khattab TZ; Mahaini L
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2021 Aug; 7(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 33258297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models.
    Koretsi V; Kirschbauer C; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3387-3396. PubMed ID: 30539294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraoral 3D Scanning or Dental Impressions for the Assessment of Dental Arch Relationships in Cleft Care: Which is Superior?
    Chalmers EV; McIntyre GT; Wang W; Gillgrass T; Martin CB; Mossey PA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Sep; 53(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 26623548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental measurements and Bolton index reliability and accuracy obtained from 2D digital, 3D segmented CBCT, and 3d intraoral laser scanner.
    San José V; Bellot-Arcís C; Tarazona B; Zamora N; O Lagravère M; Paredes-Gallardo V
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Dec; 9(12):e1466-e1473. PubMed ID: 29410764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An overview on the veracity of intraoral digital scanning system and utilization of iTero scanner for analyzing orthodontic study models both
    Jabri MA; Wu S; Pan Y; Wang L
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Jan; 24(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 33473018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning.
    Tomita Y; Uechi J; Konno M; Sasamoto S; Iijima M; Mizoguchi I
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jul; 37(4):628-633. PubMed ID: 29669951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
    Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of orthodontic brackets on intraoral and extraoral scans.
    Amaral Vargas EO; Otero Amaral Vargas D; da Silva Coqueiro R; Franzotti Sant'anna E; Melo Pithon M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Aug; 162(2):208-213. PubMed ID: 35339321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
    Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.
    Camardella LT; Vilella OV; van Hezel MM; Breuning KH
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 28361165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Bolton's Analysis among Different Malocclusion Patients Plaster Models and Digital Models Obtained by
    Jabri MA; Wu S; Zhang Y; Wang H; Pan Y; Ma J; Wang L
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Jul; 24(7):1086-1091. PubMed ID: 34290188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.