These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3840725)

  • 1. Improved reference-interval estimation.
    Shultz EK; Willard KE; Rich SS; Connelly DP; Critchfield GC
    Clin Chem; 1985 Dec; 31(12):1974-8. PubMed ID: 3840725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A computer program for estimation of reference percentile values in laboratory data.
    Rossing RG; Hatcher WE
    Comput Programs Biomed; 1979 Jan; 9(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 365438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A note on calculation of empirical P values from Monte Carlo procedure.
    North BV; Curtis D; Sham PC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Feb; 72(2):498-9. PubMed ID: 12596795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
    Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulating Univariate and Multivariate Nonnormal Distributions through the Method of Percentiles.
    Koran J; Headrick TC; Kuo TC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(2):216-32. PubMed ID: 26609879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Monte Carlo approach for estimating measurement uncertainty using standard spreadsheet software.
    Chew G; Walczyk T
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2012 Mar; 402(7):2463-9. PubMed ID: 22287047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deterministic absorbed dose estimation in computed tomography using a discrete ordinates method.
    Norris ET; Liu X; Hsieh J
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4080-7. PubMed ID: 26133608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On estimating P values by the Monte Carlo method.
    Ewens WJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Feb; 72(2):496-8. PubMed ID: 12596794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric Bayesian methods for benchmark dose estimation.
    Guha N; Roy A; Kopylev L; Fox J; Spassova M; White P
    Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1608-19. PubMed ID: 23339666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resampling methods in Microsoft Excel® for estimating reference intervals.
    Theodorsson E
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 26527366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195.
    Sechopoulos I; Ali ES; Badal A; Badano A; Boone JM; Kyprianou IS; Mainegra-Hing E; McMillan KL; McNitt-Gray MF; Rogers DW; Samei E; Turner AC
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5679-91. PubMed ID: 26429242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
    Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multidimensional B-spline parameterization of the detection probability of PET systems to improve the efficiency of Monte Carlo simulations.
    Rehfeld NS; Vauclin S; Stute S; Buvat I
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(12):3339-61. PubMed ID: 20505223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonparametric percentile estimate of clinical normal ranges.
    Massod MF
    Am J Med Technol; 1977 Mar; 43(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 848498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo simulation-based estimation for the minimum mortality temperature in temperature-mortality association study.
    Lee W; Kim H; Hwang S; Zanobetti A; Schwartz JD; Chung Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 28882102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On establishing reference values.
    Lumsden JH; Mullen K
    Can J Comp Med; 1978 Jul; 42(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 688072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using type IV Pearson distribution to calculate the probabilities of underrun and overrun of lists of multiple cases.
    Wang J; Yang K
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 Jul; 31(7):363-70. PubMed ID: 24887133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.