These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38407257)

  • 41. On the mechanical behaviour of PEEK and HA cranial implants under impact loading.
    Garcia-Gonzalez D; Jayamohan J; Sotiropoulos SN; Yoon SH; Cook J; Siviour CR; Arias A; Jérusalem A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 May; 69():342-354. PubMed ID: 28160738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) in Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction.
    Vyas K; Gibreel W; Mardini S
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2022 May; 30(2):239-253. PubMed ID: 35501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Surface roughness enhances the osseointegration of titanium headposts in non-human primates.
    Hacking SA; Boyraz P; Powers BM; Sen-Gupta E; Kucharski W; Brown CA; Cook EP
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Nov; 211(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 22975472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Individualized recording chambers for non-human primate neurophysiology.
    McAndrew RM; Lingo VanGilder JL; Naufel SN; Helms Tillery SI
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 May; 207(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22498201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Technical report: Rapid intraoperative reconstruction of cranial implants using additively manufactured moulds.
    Beaulieu K; Alkins R; Ellis RE; Kunz M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Sep; 234(9):1011-1017. PubMed ID: 32627709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Surgical planning using three-dimensional imaging and computer modeling.
    Mankovich NJ; Samson D; Pratt W; Lew D; Beumer J
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1994 Oct; 27(5):875-89. PubMed ID: 7816436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Custom implant design for large cranial defects.
    Marreiros FM; Heuzé Y; Verius M; Unterhofer C; Freysinger W; Recheis W
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2217-2230. PubMed ID: 27358081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Three-dimensional deep learning to automatically generate cranial implant geometry.
    Wu CT; Yang YH; Chang YZ
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2683. PubMed ID: 35177704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The feasibility of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer.
    Tan ET; Ling JM; Dinesh SK
    J Neurosurg; 2016 May; 124(5):1531-7. PubMed ID: 26566203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Acrylic cranial implant: an alternative vector in management of cranial defect.
    Koli DK; Nanda A; Verma M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e591-4. PubMed ID: 23172488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Minimizing bone gaps when using custom pediatric cranial implants is associated with implant success.
    Bowers CA; McMullin JH; Brimley C; Etherington L; Siddiqi FA; Riva-Cambrin J
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2015 Oct; 16(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 26161719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Homogenous scaffold-based cranial/skull implant modelling and structural analysis-unit cell algorithm-meshless approach.
    Phanindra Bogu V; Ravi Kumar Y; Kumar Khanra A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Nov; 55(11):2053-2065. PubMed ID: 28474182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cranial implant design using augmented reality immersive system.
    Ai Z; Evenhouse R; Leigh J; Charbel F; Rasmussen M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 125():7-12. PubMed ID: 17377223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The simplified tailor-made workflows for a 3D slicer-based craniofacial implant design.
    Tantisatirapong S; Khunakornpattanakarn S; Suesatsakul T; Boonpratatong A; Benjamin I; Tongmeesee S; Kangkorn T; Chanwimalueang T
    Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):2850. PubMed ID: 36801943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Streamlined, Inexpensive 3D Printing of the Brain and Skull.
    Naftulin JS; Kimchi EY; Cash SS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136198. PubMed ID: 26295459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Design of customized implants and 3D printing of symmetric and asymmetric cranial cavities.
    Singh HN; Agrawal S; Kuthe AM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106061. PubMed ID: 37544200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Next-generation personalized cranioplasty treatment.
    Thimukonda Jegadeesan J; Baldia M; Basu B
    Acta Biomater; 2022 Dec; 154():63-82. PubMed ID: 36272686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Computer-based surgical planning and custom-made titanium implants for cranial fibrous dysplasia.
    Tehli O; Dursun AM; Temiz C; Solmaz I; Kural C; Kutlay M; Kacar Y; Ezgu MC; Oguz E; Daneyemez MK; Izci Y
    Neurosurgery; 2015 Jun; 11 Suppl 2():213-9. PubMed ID: 25950887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Recent refinements to cranial implants for rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).
    Johnston JM; Cohen YE; Shirley H; Tsunada J; Bennur S; Christison-Lagay K; Veeder CL
    Lab Anim (NY); 2016 May; 45(5):180-6. PubMed ID: 27096188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical evaluation of rapid 3D print-formed implants for surgical reconstruction of large cranial defects.
    Kwarcinski J; Boughton P; van Gelder J; Damodaran O; Doolan A; Ruys A
    ANZ J Surg; 2021 Jun; 91(6):1226-1232. PubMed ID: 33021022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.