125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38412318)
1. Radical prostatectomy cancer grade and percentage of Gleason pattern 4 estimated by global vs individual tumor grading correlate differently with the risk of biochemical recurrence in Grade Group 2 and 3 cancers.
Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI; Merhe A; Iakymenko OA; E Silva RA; Chanamolu DK; Briski LM; Kwon D; Nemov I; Punnen S; Pollack A; Stoyanova R; Parekh DJ; Jorda M; Gonzalgo ML
Am J Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38412318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers.
Iakymenko OA; Lugo I; Briski LM; Nemov I; Punnen S; Kwon D; Pollack A; Stoyanova R; Parekh DJ; Jorda M; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
Prostate; 2021 Sep; 81(12):866-873. PubMed ID: 34184782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy.
Diolombi ML; Epstein JI
BJU Int; 2017 Jun; 119(6):872-878. PubMed ID: 27496532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients.
Seyrek N; Hollemans E; Osanto S; Pelger RCM; van der Poel HG; Bekers E; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG; van Leenders GJLH
Histopathology; 2022 Feb; 80(3):558-565. PubMed ID: 34706119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Convolutional Neural Network Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 and Association With Biochemical Recurrence in Intermediate-Grade Prostate Tumors.
Chen Y; Loveless IM; Nakai T; Newaz R; Abdollah FF; Rogers CG; Hassan O; Chitale D; Arora K; Williamson SR; Gupta NS; Rybicki BA; Sadasivan SM; Levin AM
Mod Pathol; 2023 Jul; 36(7):100157. PubMed ID: 36925071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variance of Tumor Grade at Radical Prostatectomy With Assessment of Each Tumor Nodule Versus Global Grading.
Iakymenko OA; Briski LM; Punnen S; Nemov I; Lugo I; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Aug; 146(8):1032-1036. PubMed ID: 34752602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Grade group 2 (10% ≥ GP4) patients have very similar malignant potential with grade group 1 patients, given the risk of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.
Kato M; Hirakawa A; Sato H; Hanazawa R; Naito Y; Tochigi K; Sano T; Ishida S; Funahashi Y; Fujita T; Matsukawa Y; Hattori R; Tsuzuki T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Apr; 26(4):764-769. PubMed ID: 33385274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oncologic Outcomes of Total Length Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.
Perera M; Assel MJ; Benfante NE; Vickers AJ; Reuter VE; Carlsson S; Laudone V; Touijer KA; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Fine SW; Ehdaie B
J Urol; 2022 Aug; 208(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 35363038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significance of the Percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Adverse Pathology on Radical Prostatectomy: Application in Active Surveillance.
Ordner J; Flaifel A; Serrano A; Graziano R; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2023 Jul; 160(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 36897217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternative prostate cancer grading systems incorporating percent pattern 4/5 (IQ-Gleason) and cribriform architecture (cGrade) improve prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Seyrek N; Hollemans E; Andrinopoulou ER; Osanto S; Pelger RCM; van der Poel HG; Bekers E; Remmers S; Schoots IG; van Leenders GJLH
Virchows Arch; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 35157140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern.
van der Slot MA; Seyrek N; Kweldam CF; den Bakker MA; Busstra MB; Gan M; Klaver S; Rietbergen JBW; van Leenders GJLH
World J Urol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):2723-2729. PubMed ID: 36190529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of the 2014 Gleason grade grouping in a Canadian cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer.
Wissing M; Brimo F; Chevalier S; Scarlata E; McKercher G; O'Flaherty A; Aprikian S; Thibodeau V; Saad F; Carmel M; Lacombe L; Têtu B; Ekindi-Ndongo N; Latour M; Trudel D; Aprikian A
BJU Int; 2019 Apr; 123(4):624-631. PubMed ID: 30113732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combination of total length of Gleason pattern 4 and number of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 cores detects similar outcome group to Gleason score 6 cancers among cases with ≥5% of Gleason pattern 4.
Sato S; Kimura T; Onuma H; Fukuda Y; Egawa S; Takahashi H
Pathol Int; 2020 Dec; 70(12):992-998. PubMed ID: 32997878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blood Prostate-specific Antigen by Volume of Benign, Gleason Pattern 3 and 4 Prostate Tissue.
Andolfi C; Vickers AJ; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR; Cowan JE; Paner GP; Helfand BT; Liauw SL; Eggener SE
Urology; 2022 Dec; 170():154-160. PubMed ID: 35987380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Gleason pattern 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens in current practice - Quantification, morphology and concordance with biopsy.
de Souza MF; de Azevedo Araujo ALC; da Silva MT; Athanazio DA
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2018 Jun; 34():13-17. PubMed ID: 29661718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Tumor Grade, Stage, and Margin Status Does Not Independently Influence the Likelihood of Biochemical Recurrence in Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
Kryvenko ON; Iakymenko OA; De Lima Guido LP; Bhattu AS; Merhe A; Mouzannar A; Briski LM; Oymagil I; Lugo I; Nemov I; Ritch CR; Kava BR; Punnen S; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Gonzalgo ML
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Aug; 146(8):1012-1017. PubMed ID: 34739539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 at MRI-Guided Biopsy to Predict Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.
Kamecki H; Mielczarek Ł; Szempliński S; Dębowska M; Rajwa P; Baboudjian M; Klemm J; Rivas JG; Modzelewska E; Tayara O; Malewski W; Szostek P; Poletajew S; Kryst P; Sosnowski R; Nyk Ł
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Nov; 15(22):. PubMed ID: 38001723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
