BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38412761)

  • 1. Metacognitive judgment formation during map learning: Evidence for global monitoring.
    Mason LA; Thomas AK; Taylor HA
    Cognition; 2024 May; 246():105743. PubMed ID: 38412761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.
    Jang Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).
    Nelson TO; Narens L; Dunlosky J
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 15053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do metacognitive judgments alter memory performance beyond the benefits of retrieval practice? A comment on and replication attempt of Dougherty, Scheck, Nelson, and Narens (2005).
    Dougherty MR; Robey AM; Buttaccio D
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 29368228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.
    Hu X; Liu Z; Li T; Luo L
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 25686085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Forward Effect of Delayed Judgments of Learning Is Influenced by Difficulty in Memory and Category Learning.
    Wang X; Liu X; Chen L; Feng K; Ye Q; Zhu H
    J Intell; 2023 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 37367503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are feeling-of-knowing and judgment-of-learning different? Evidence from older adults.
    Souchay C; Isingrini M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):458-64. PubMed ID: 22342997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. People hold mood-congruent beliefs about memory but do not use these beliefs when monitoring their learning.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK; Goodrich M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Apr; 48(4):499-519. PubMed ID: 34694826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The sensitivity of judgment-of-learning resolution to past test performance, new learning, and forgetting.
    Ariel R; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 21264621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
    Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
    Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ERP study on metacognitive monitoring processes in children.
    Tsalas NRH; Müller BCN; Meinhardt J; Proust J; Paulus M; Sodian B
    Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 1695():84-90. PubMed ID: 29852136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the proposed role of metacognition in environment learning: recommendations for research.
    Mason LA; Thomas AK; Taylor HA
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Dec; 7(1):104. PubMed ID: 36575318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metacognitive Illusions: A Positivity Effect in Judgments of Learning for Older but Not Younger Adults.
    Sun X; Jiang Y
    J Intell; 2023 Feb; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 36976133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developmental changes and the effect of self-generated feedback in metacognitive controlled spacing strategies in 7-year-olds, 10-year-olds, and adults.
    Tsalas N; Paulus M; Sodian B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Apr; 132():140-54. PubMed ID: 25703006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.