154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38413473)
1. Postoperative outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score matched comparison focused on patient mobilization, return to bowel function, and pain.
Bertolo R; Ditonno F; Veccia A; De Marco V; Migliorini F; Porcaro AB; Rizzetto R; Cerruto MA; Autorino R; Antonelli A;
J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):96. PubMed ID: 38413473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Multi-Institutional Propensity Score Matched Comparison of Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Posterior Tumors.
Paulucci DJ; Beksac AT; Porter J; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Badani KK
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jan; 29(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30106606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Posterior Tumors Through a Retroperitoneal Approach Offers Decreased Length of Stay Compared with the Transperitoneal Approach: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Maurice MJ; Kaouk JH; Ramirez D; Bhayani SB; Allaf ME; Rogers CG; Stifelman MD
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27927035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with completely endophytic kidney tumors.
Okhawere KE; Rich JM; Ucpinar B; Beksac AT; Saini I; Deluxe A; Zuluaga L; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Porter J; Abaza R; Mansour A; Stifelman MD; Crivellaro S; Pierorazio PM; Zaytoun O; Badani KK
Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):111.e1-111.e6. PubMed ID: 36528472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores.
Choo SH; Lee SY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Seo SI
World J Urol; 2014 Dec; 32(6):1523-9. PubMed ID: 24817141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Obesity.
Okhawere KE; Rich JM; Beksac AT; Zuluaga L; Saini I; Ucpinar B; Levieddin J; Joel IT; Deluxe A; Stifelman MD; Crivellaro S; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Porter J; Mansour A; Pierorazio PM; Zaytoun O; Badani KK
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Sep; 33(9):835-840. PubMed ID: 37339434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Is Off Clamp Always Beneficial During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy? A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Clamp Technique in Patients with Two Kidneys.
Rosen DC; Paulucci DJ; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1176-1182. PubMed ID: 28954531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five-year Oncologic Outcomes After Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Andrade HS; Zargar H; Caputo PA; Akca O; Kara O; Ramirez D; Haber GP; Stein RJ; Kaouk JH
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1149-54. PubMed ID: 26719014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score of 7 or higher).
Jang HJ; Song W; Suh YS; Jeong US; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Seo SI
Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):808-13. PubMed ID: 25512815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons of surgical outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for lateral renal tumors: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis.
Takagi T; Yoshida K; Kondo T; Kobayashi H; Iizuka J; Okumi M; Ishida H; Tanabe K
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 32358741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for anatomically complex T1b renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score ≥7: A propensity score-based analysis.
Deng W; Li J; Liu X; Chen L; Liu W; Zhou X; Zhu J; Fu B; Wang G
Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):586-594. PubMed ID: 31788986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retroperitoneal Versus Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Multicenter Matched-pair Analysis.
Harke NN; Darr C; Radtke JP; von Ostau N; Schiefelbein F; Eraky A; Hamann C; Szarvas T; Hadaschik BA; Tropmann-Frick M; Juenemann KP; Schoen G; Osmonov D
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1363-1370. PubMed ID: 32912841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing.
Laviana AA; Tan HJ; Hu JC; Weizer AZ; Chang SS; Barocas DA
Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29278580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review.
Bourgi A; Ayoub E; Merhej S; Souky J; Roupret M; Bruyère F
J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2563-2574. PubMed ID: 37596485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cold ischemia technique during robotic partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparison with open approach.
Garisto J; Bertolo R; Agudelo J; Armanyous S; Gao T; Lioudis M; Kaouk JH
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2019 Apr; 71(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 30421595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the Trade-off Between the Safety and Effectiveness of Off-clamp Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses with a High RENAL Score: A Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Perioperative and Functional Outcomes in a Multicenter Analysis.
Tuderti G; Mastroianni R; Anceschi U; Bove AM; Brassetti A; Ferriero M; Misuraca L; Guaglianone S; Costantini M; Torregiani G; Saidian A; Mari A; Narasimhan R; Derweesh I; Minervini A; Gallucci M; Simone G
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Nov; 9(6):1037-1043. PubMed ID: 37263828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
Desai MM; Strzempkowski B; Matin SF; Steinberg AP; Ng C; Meraney AM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 15592021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is Extensive Parenchymal Resection During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Justified? A Match-Paired Comparison of Two Extirpative Surgical Modalities for Treatment of a Complex Renal Neoplasm.
Andrade HS; Zargar H; Akca O; Caputo PA; Ramirez D; Kara O; Stein RJ; Chueh SC; Kaouk JH
J Endourol; 2016 Apr; 30(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 26486995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Open versus robotic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis (UroCCR 43-Robese study).
Beauval JB; Khene ZE; Roumiguié M; Rahota R; Mejean A; Doumerc N; Roupret M; Paparel P; Villers A; Bruyere F; Lebacle C; Nouhaud FX; Champy C; de la Taille A; Lang H; Rizk J; Durand M; Dariane C; Charles T; Boissier R; Long JA; Bigot P; Bensalah K; Bernhard JC
World J Urol; 2024 Apr; 42(1):213. PubMed ID: 38581466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Off-clamp vs on-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes from a propensity-score matching between two high-volume centers.
Bertolo R; Simone G; Garisto J; Nakhoul G; Armanyous S; Agudelo J; Costantini M; Tuderti G; Gallucci M; Kaouk J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1232-1237. PubMed ID: 30553632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
