These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38414262)

  • 1. The role of social support in human-automation interaction.
    Sauer J; Sonderegger A; Semmer NK
    Ergonomics; 2024 Jun; 67(6):732-743. PubMed ID: 38414262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models.
    Parasuraman R
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jul; 43(7):931-51. PubMed ID: 10929828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Humans: still vital after all these years of automation.
    Parasuraman R; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2008 Jun; 50(3):511-20. PubMed ID: 18689061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of a pivotal Human Factors article: "Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse".
    Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2008 Jun; 50(3):404-10. PubMed ID: 18689046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social stress and performance in human-machine interaction: a neglected research field.
    Sauer J; Schmutz S; Sonderegger A; Messerli N
    Ergonomics; 2019 Nov; 62(11):1377-1391. PubMed ID: 31389756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation.
    Parasuraman R; Sheridan TB; Wickens CD
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum; 2000 May; 30(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11760769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Providing different levels of accuracy about the reliability of automation to a human operator: impact on human performance.
    Avril E
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):217-226. PubMed ID: 35451925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.
    Hoff KA; Bashir M
    Hum Factors; 2015 May; 57(3):407-34. PubMed ID: 25875432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments.
    Cuevas HM; Fiore SM; Caldwell BS; Strater L
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B63-70. PubMed ID: 17547306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task partitioning effects in semi-automated human-machine system performance.
    Hancock PA
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(9):1387-99. PubMed ID: 24020751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.
    Nordhoff S; Stapel J; He X; Gentner A; Happee R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260953. PubMed ID: 34932565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Teaming humans and automated systems in safely engineered environments.
    Connors MM
    Life Support Biosph Sci; 1998; 5(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 11871455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptable (Not Adaptive) Automation: Forefront of Human-Automation Teaming.
    Calhoun G
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 34435537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preface to the Special Issue on Human Factors and Advanced Vehicle Automation: Of Benefits, Barriers, and Bridges to Safe and Effective Implementation.
    Horrey WJ; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 32119576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pilots' monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: an empirical study combining behavioral and eye-tracking data.
    Sarter NB; Mumaw RJ; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2007 Jun; 49(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 17552302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human Performance Consequences of Automated Decision Aids: The Impact of Time Pressure.
    Rieger T; Manzey D
    Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 64(4):617-634. PubMed ID: 33111557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
    Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Automation-by-Expertise-by-Training Interaction.
    Strauch B
    Hum Factors; 2017 Mar; 59(2):204-228. PubMed ID: 27591208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.