These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38414266)

  • 41. Policy development lessons from two federal initiatives: protecting human research subjects and handling misconduct in science.
    Porter JP; Dustira AK
    Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S51-5. PubMed ID: 8373492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Conflict of interest and the university.
    Resnik DB; Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 2002; 9(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 12705246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Understanding College Students' Perceived Help-Seeking Knowledge and Awareness about Sexual Misconduct Policies and Procedures.
    Pinchevsky GM; Hayes BE
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jan; 38(1-2):NP726-NP749. PubMed ID: 35360979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Can a good tree bring forth evil fruit? The funding of medical research by industry.
    Capps B
    Br Med Bull; 2016 Jun; 118(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 27151955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Misconduct in medical research: whose responsibility?
    Breen KJ
    Intern Med J; 2003 Apr; 33(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 12680986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students.
    Parrish DM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2004 Jul; 10(3):483-91. PubMed ID: 15362705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Research misconduct and its federal regulation: the origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity--with personal views by ORI's former associate director for investigative oversight.
    Price AR
    Account Res; 2013; 20(5-6):291-319. PubMed ID: 24028479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The New Academic Environment and Faculty Misconduct.
    Binder R; Friedli A; Fuentes-Afflick E
    Acad Med; 2016 Feb; 91(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 26488567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions.
    Resnik DB; Neal T; Raymond A; Kissling GE
    Account Res; 2015; 22(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 25275621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Review of the Scientific Misconduct Inquiry Process, Ankara Chamber of Medicine, Turkey.
    Gökçay B; Arda B
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Aug; 23(4):1097-1112. PubMed ID: 27896602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Scientific misconduct and liability for the acts of others.
    Spece RG; Bernstein C
    Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):477-91. PubMed ID: 17970247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The problem of plagiarism.
    Anderson MS; Steneck NH
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 21194643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. What criteria are used in the investigation of alleged cases of research misconduct?
    Abdi S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2023 Feb; 30(2):109-131. PubMed ID: 34455868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Historical model for editor and Office of Research Integrity cooperation in handling allegations, investigation, and retraction in a contentious (Abbs) case of research misconduct.
    Price AR; Daroff RB
    Account Res; 2015; 22(2):63-80. PubMed ID: 25397599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluating research misconduct policies at major research universities: a pilot study.
    Lind RA
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):241-62. PubMed ID: 16634174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of sexual misconduct complaints: the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners, 1991 to 1995.
    Enbom JA; Thomas CD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1340-6; discussion 1346-8. PubMed ID: 9215194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Researchers experience of misconduct in research in Malaysian higher education institutions.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Account Res; 2018; 25(3):125-141. PubMed ID: 29394103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [New Swedish legislation on research misconduct from 2020].
    Asplund K
    Lakartidningen; 2019 Dec; 116():. PubMed ID: 31846052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review.
    Dahlberg JE; Davidian NM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):713-35. PubMed ID: 20526693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Australia needs an office of academic integrity.
    Hall BM
    Med J Aust; 2006 Dec 4-18; 185(11-12):619-22. PubMed ID: 17181506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.