These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3841450)

  • 1. Diagnosis and prevention of total deafness in relation to selection criteria of cochlear implant.
    van de Heyning PH; Marquet J
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1985; 39(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 3841450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):78-89. PubMed ID: 15925193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Auditory evoked potentials by electric stimulation of the cochlea].
    Sarfati D; Bestry C; Moatti L; Garabedian EN
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 7645888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Test of electrical stimulation of the round window. Diagnostic and prognostic value of the rehabilitation of total deafness by cochlear implant].
    Chouard CH; Koca E; Meyer B; Jacquier I
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 7825941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Criteria and procedures for selection of children with acquired or congenital deafness for cochlear implants in Europe].
    Reid J
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1994; 144(1-2):16-9. PubMed ID: 8197757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Electrophysiological tests in the evaluation of selection for cochlear implants].
    Fraysse B; Vincent M; Corvera G; Estève-Fraysse MJ; Deguine O
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1991; 45(2):247-51. PubMed ID: 2063670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9-30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use.
    Gordon KA; Valero J; Papsin BC
    Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):97-107. PubMed ID: 17850999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiologic evaluation of the cochlear implant patient.
    Stypulkowski PH; van den Honert C; Kvistad SD
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 3754948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Etiological evaluation of deafness in children].
    Szliwowski HB; Courtoy M; Bourgeois R; Avni EF; van Regemorter N; Bourgeois M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1985; 39(4):672-7. PubMed ID: 3841449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unanswered questions concerning the indication for cochlear implant.
    Banfai P; Fellner E; Finkenzeller P; Karczag A; Kubik S; Lüers P; Sürth W
    Am J Otol; 1988 May; 9(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 3177604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.
    Sharma A; Dorman MF; Kral A
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):134-43. PubMed ID: 15855038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P; Eichele T; Buechler M; Debener S; Jäncke L; Dillier N; Hugdahl K; Meyer M
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory brain stem response evoked by electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant.
    Brown CD; Antognelli T; Gibson WP
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():125-9. PubMed ID: 8273466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Postmeningitis deafness in young children: action warranted before obliteration of the cochlea].
    Merkus P; van Furth AM; Goverts ST; Suèr M; Smits CF; Smit C
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(22):1209-13. PubMed ID: 17583085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrically evoked auditory potentials: current clinical applications in children with cochlear implants.
    Kileny PR; Zwolan TA; Boerst A; Telian SA
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S90-2. PubMed ID: 9391613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.