181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38415878)
1. Early experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: nationwide propensity-score-matched analysis.
de Graaf N; Zwart MJW; van Hilst J; van den Broek B; Bonsing BA; Busch OR; Coene PLO; Daams F; van Dieren S; van Eijck CHJ; Festen S; de Hingh IHJT; Lips DJ; Luyer MDP; Mieog JSD; van Santvoort HC; van der Schelling GP; Stommel MWJ; de Wilde RF; Molenaar IQ; Groot Koerkamp B; Besselink MG
Br J Surg; 2024 Jan; 111(2):. PubMed ID: 38415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula.
McMillan MT; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Kowalsky SJ; Zeh HJ; Sprys MH; Vollmer CM
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 28030724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic, and open pancreatoduodenectomy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.
Kabir T; Tan HL; Syn NL; Wu EJ; Kam JH; Goh BKP
Surgery; 2022 Feb; 171(2):476-489. PubMed ID: 34454723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study.
Emmen AMLH; Zwart MJW; Khatkov IE; Boggi U; Groot Koerkamp B; Busch OR; Saint-Marc O; Dokmak S; Molenaar IQ; D'Hondt M; Ramera M; Keck T; Ferrari G; Luyer MDP; Moraldi L; Ielpo B; Wittel U; Souche FR; Hackert T; Lips D; Can MF; Bosscha K; Fara R; Festen S; van Dieren S; Coratti A; De Hingh I; Mazzola M; Wellner U; De Meyere C; van Santvoort HC; Aussilhou B; Ibenkhayat A; de Wilde RF; Kauffmann EF; Tyutyunnik P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Surgery; 2024 Jun; 175(6):1587-1594. PubMed ID: 38570225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival and surgical outcomes of robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary cancer: A propensity score-matching comparison.
Shyr BS; Wang SE; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Shyr BU
Asian J Surg; 2024 Feb; 47(2):899-904. PubMed ID: 37925285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial.
van Hilst J; de Rooij T; Bosscha K; Brinkman DJ; van Dieren S; Dijkgraaf MG; Gerhards MF; de Hingh IH; Karsten TM; Lips DJ; Luyer MD; Busch OR; Festen S; Besselink MG;
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Mar; 4(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 30685489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: Propensity Score-matched Analysis.
Nickel F; Wise PA; Müller PC; Kuemmerli C; Cizmic A; Salg GA; Steinle V; Niessen A; Mayer P; Mehrabi A; Loos M; Müller-Stich BP; Kulu Y; Büchler MW; Hackert T
Ann Surg; 2024 Apr; 279(4):665-670. PubMed ID: 37389886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Napoli N; Kauffmann EF; Menonna F; Costa F; Iacopi S; Amorese G; Giorgi S; Baggiani A; Boggi U
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 28812160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical outcome of a double versus a single pancreatoduodenectomy per operating day.
Theijse RT; Stoop TF; Geerdink NJ; Daams F; Zonderhuis BM; Erdmann JI; Swijnenburg RJ; Kazemier G; Busch OR; Besselink MG
Surgery; 2023 May; 173(5):1263-1269. PubMed ID: 36842911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Additional modifications to the Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: Results of a propensity score-matched analysis versus Cattel-Warren pancreaticojejunostomy.
Menonna F; Napoli N; Kauffmann EF; Iacopi S; Gianfaldoni C; Martinelli C; Amorese G; Vistoli F; Boggi U
Surgery; 2021 Apr; 169(4):954-962. PubMed ID: 32958267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of conversion to open surgery during robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and effect on outcomes: international propensity score-matched comparison study.
Lof S; Vissers FL; Klompmaker S; Berti S; Boggi U; Coratti A; Dokmak S; Fara R; Festen S; D'Hondt M; Khatkov I; Lips D; Luyer M; Manzoni A; Rosso E; Saint-Marc O; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Br J Surg; 2021 Jan; 108(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 33640946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival and Robotic Approach for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity Score-Match Study.
Rosemurgy AS; Ross SB; Espeut A; Nguyen D; Crespo K; Syblis C; Vasanthakumar P; Sucandy I
J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Apr; 234(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35290288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is there any difference for frail patients?
Paolini C; Bencini L; Gabellini L; Urciuoli I; Pacciani S; Tribuzi A; Moraldi L; Calistri M; Coratti A
Surg Oncol; 2021 Jun; 37():101515. PubMed ID: 33429323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
de Rooij T; van Hilst J; Bosscha K; Dijkgraaf MG; Gerhards MF; Groot Koerkamp B; Hagendoorn J; de Hingh IH; Karsten TM; Lips DJ; Luyer MD; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Tran TCK; Busch OR; Festen S; Besselink MG;
Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 29298706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.
Uijterwijk BA; Lemmers DHL; Bolm L; Luyer M; Koh YX; Mazzola M; Webber L; Kazemier G; Bannone E; Ramaekers M; Ielpo B; Wellner U; Koek S; Giani A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e570-e579. PubMed ID: 36730852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: A propensity score-matched study.
Wang SE; Shyr BU; Chen SC; Shyr YM
Surgery; 2018 Dec; 164(6):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 30093277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore.
Low TY; Koh YX; Goh BK
Singapore Med J; 2020 Nov; 61(11):598-604. PubMed ID: 31535153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Feasibility, Proficiency, and Mastery Learning Curves in 635 Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies Following a Multicenter Training Program: "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants".
Zwart MJW; van den Broek B; de Graaf N; Suurmeijer JA; Augustinus S; Te Riele WW; van Santvoort HC; Hagendoorn J; Borel Rinkes IHM; van Dam JL; Takagi K; Tran KTC; Schreinemakers J; van der Schelling G; Wijsman JH; de Wilde RF; Festen S; Daams F; Luyer MD; de Hingh IHJT; Mieog JSD; Bonsing BA; Lips DJ; Abu Hilal M; Busch OR; Saint-Marc O; Zeh HJ; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Koerkamp BG; Molenaar IQ; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2023 Dec; 278(6):e1232-e1241. PubMed ID: 37288547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-centre comparison of robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched study.
Bencini L; Tofani F; Paolini C; Vaccaro C; Checcacci P; Annecchiarico M; Moraldi L; Farsi M; Polvani S; Coratti A
Surg Endosc; 2020 Dec; 34(12):5402-5412. PubMed ID: 31932933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
