These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38415958)

  • 1. Delayed feedback could either help or hurt test-enhanced learning; it depends.
    Nelson A
    Med Educ; 2024 Jul; 58(7):772-774. PubMed ID: 38415958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Twelve tips for increasing the defensibility of assessment decisions.
    Hays RB; Hamlin G; Crane L
    Med Teach; 2015 May; 37(5):433-6. PubMed ID: 25109230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-exam feedback with question rationales improves re-test performance of medical students on a multiple-choice exam.
    Levant B; Zückert W; Paolo A
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Dec; 23(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 30043313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Timing's not everything: Immediate and delayed feedback are equally beneficial for performance in formative multiple-choice testing.
    Ryan AT; Judd T; Wilson C; Larsen DP; Elliott S; Kulasegaram K; Swanson D
    Med Educ; 2024 Jul; 58(7):838-847. PubMed ID: 38017648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Twelve tips to promote successful development of a learner performance dashboard within a medical education program.
    Boscardin C; Fergus KB; Hellevig B; Hauer KE
    Med Teach; 2018 Aug; 40(8):855-861. PubMed ID: 29117744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Difficult debriefing situations: A toolbox for simulation educators.
    Grant VJ; Robinson T; Catena H; Eppich W; Cheng A
    Med Teach; 2018 Jul; 40(7):703-712. PubMed ID: 29792100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Make No Assumptions, Give Lots of Tests.
    Farley DR
    J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Jul; 233(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 33548447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tensions in post-examination feedback: information for learning versus potential for harm.
    Ryan A; McColl GJ; O'Brien R; Chiavaroli N; Judd T; Finch S; Swanson D
    Med Educ; 2017 Sep; 51(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 28833428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Portfolio-based learning and assessment.
    Joshi MK; Gupta P; Singh T
    Indian Pediatr; 2015 Mar; 52(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 25849001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing.
    Eppich W; Cheng A
    Simul Healthc; 2015 Apr; 10(2):106-15. PubMed ID: 25710312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refocusing formative feedback to enhance learning in pre-registration nurse education.
    Koh LC
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2008 Jul; 8(4):223-30. PubMed ID: 17959416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Long Case as a Formative Assessment Tool - Views of Medical Students.
    Masih CS; Benson C
    Ulster Med J; 2019 May; 88(2):124-127. PubMed ID: 31061562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
    Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structured Debriefing in Simulation-Based Education.
    Palaganas JC; Fey M; Simon R
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2016 Feb; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 26909457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Embedding of the progress test in an assessment program designed according to the principles of programmatic assessment.
    Heeneman S; Schut S; Donkers J; van der Vleuten C; Muijtjens A
    Med Teach; 2017 Jan; 39(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 27646870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [360-degree feedback for medical trainees].
    Holm E; Holm K; Sørensen JL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Dec; 176(49):. PubMed ID: 25497857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of work-based assessments in postgraduate medical education.
    Alazzawi S; Berstock J
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2019 May; 80(5):285-287. PubMed ID: 31059341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative and quantitative feedback in the context of competency-based education.
    Tekian A; Watling CJ; Roberts TE; Steinert Y; Norcini J
    Med Teach; 2017 Dec; 39(12):1245-1249. PubMed ID: 28927332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of feedback during formative testing on study behaviour and performance of (bio)medical students: a randomised controlled study.
    Thijssen DHJ; Hopman MTE; van Wijngaarden MT; Hoenderop JGJ; Bindels RJM; Eijsvogels TMH
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 30943962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method of providing engaging formative feedback to large cohort first-year physiology and anatomy students.
    Weston-Green K; Wallace M
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Sep; 40(3):393-7. PubMed ID: 27503899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.