135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38415998)
1. Prosthetic Complications in Implant Restorations.
Stanford CM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 39(1):14-17. PubMed ID: 38415998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Common Prosthetic Implant Complications in Fixed Restorations.
Link-Bindo EE; Soltys J; Donatelli D; Cavanaugh R
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2016 Jul; 37(7):431-436;quiz439. PubMed ID: 27548395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prosthetic complications of fixed dental prostheses supported by locking-taper implants: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years.
Gao WM; Geng W; Luo CC
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):476. PubMed ID: 34579694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fixed restorations supported by Morse-taper connection implants: a retrospective clinical study with 10-20 years of follow-up.
Mangano C; Iaculli F; Piattelli A; Mangano F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1229-36. PubMed ID: 24954285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up.
Mangano F; Macchi A; Caprioglio A; Sammons RL; Piattelli A; Mangano C
J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 24750435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of marginal bone loss, survival rate, and prosthetic complications in implant-supported splinted and nonsplinted restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah AH; Patel P; Trivedi A; Shah A; Desai N; Talati M
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(2):111-121. PubMed ID: 36511022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of prosthetic restorations on bone-lock implants in patients after oral tumor resection.
Kovács AF
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 9835838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Cruz RS; Oliveira HFF; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 29961632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological and Technical Complications of Splinted or Nonsplinted Dental Implants: A Decision Tree for Selection.
Ravidà A; Saleh MHA; Muriel MC; Maska B; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 29283896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prosthetic failure in implant dentistry.
Sadid-Zadeh R; Kutkut A; Kim H
Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 59(1):195-214. PubMed ID: 25434566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-term performance of implant-supported restorations fitted in general dental practice: A retrospective study.
Klotz AL; Ott L; Krisam J; Schmitz S; Seyidaliyeva A; Rammelsberg P; Zenthöfer A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1169–1176. PubMed ID: 31107934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixed and Removable Full-Arch Restorations Supported by Short (≤ 8-mm) Dental Implants In the Mandible: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pauletto P; Ruales-Carrera E; Gonçalves TMSV; Philippi AG; Donos N; Mezzomo LA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):873–885. PubMed ID: 30768659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical complications of implant-supported restorations with internal conical connection implants: A 14-year retrospective study.
Yi Y; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):732-740. PubMed ID: 34481672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monolithic and Minimally Veneered Zirconia Complications as Implant-Supported Restorative Material: A Retrospective Clinical Study up to 5 Years.
Diéguez-Pereira M; Chávarri-Prado D; Estrada-Martínez A; Pérez-Pevida E; Brizuela-Velasco A
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():8821068. PubMed ID: 33134389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Private practice results of dental implants. Part I: survival and evaluation of risk factors--Part II: surgical and prosthetic complications.
Kourtis SG; Sotiriadou S; Voliotis S; Challas A
Implant Dent; 2004 Dec; 13(4):373-85. PubMed ID: 15592000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-prosthetic Rehabilitation with and without Platform Switching: A Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study.
Gago-García A; Barrilero-Martín C; Petrakakis P; de Elio-Oliveros J; Del Canto-Pingarrón M; Alobera-Gracia MÁ; Seco-Calvo J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 35000950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective evaluation of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants: 1- to 6-year data.
Mangano C; Mangano F; Shibli JA; Tettamanti L; Figliuzzi M; d'Avila S; Sammons RL; Piattelli A
J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 20653436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Evaluation of Complications in Implant-Supported Dentures: A 4-Year Retrospective Study.
Ülkü SZ; Acun Kaya F; Uysal E; Gulsun B
Med Sci Monit; 2017 Dec; 23():6137-6143. PubMed ID: 29281613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing zirconia-based versus metal-based implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the premolar region.
Hosseini M; Worsaae N; Gotfredsen K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Aug; 33(8):792-803. PubMed ID: 35633183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of implant restorative emergence angle and contour on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Atieh MA; Shah M; Ameen M; Tawse-Smith A; Alsabeeha NHM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):840-852. PubMed ID: 37183357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
