These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38416005)

  • 1. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of an Implant System with an Internal Conical Connection and Microthreads.
    Tan LW; Quek C; Leo SJ; Seetoh YL; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 39(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 38416005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections.
    Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
    Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of a One-Size Implant- Abutment Connection System.
    Ang KY; Quek C; Kong Fei FL; Seetoh YL; Tan LW; Choon Tan KB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 May; 0(0):1-29. PubMed ID: 38717354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter.
    Quek CE; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):929-36. PubMed ID: 17190303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
    Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
    Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abutment rotational freedom on five implant systems with different internal connections.
    Bédouin Y; Lefrançois E; Salomon JP; Auroy P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):433-439. PubMed ID: 34238536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental implant-abutment fracture resistance and wear induced by single-unit screw-retained CAD components fabricated by four CAM methods after mechanical cycling.
    Markarian RA; Galles DP; França FMG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 33640089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
    Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fatigue survival and failure resistance of titanium versus zirconia implant abutments with various connection designs.
    Sen N; Us YO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 31326150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical performance of conical implant-abutment connections under different cyclic loading conditions.
    Yao KT; Kao HC; Cheng CK; Fang HW; Huang CH; Hsu ML
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():426-432. PubMed ID: 30445369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study.
    Yilmaz B; Çakmak G; Batak B; Johnston WM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 33938119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
    Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effects of a Vertical Compressive Cyclic Load on Abutment Screws and the Stability of the Prosthesis in Nonengaging and Partially Engaging Abutments in a Screw-Retained Splinted Fixed Dental Prosthesis.
    Kwan JC; Kwan N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):571-578. PubMed ID: 35727250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Original vs compatible stock abutment- implant connection: An in vitro analysis of the internal accuracy and mechanical fatigue behaviour.
    Alonso-Pérez R; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
    J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Jul; 66(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 34866067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.