179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38416239)
1. Psychometric performance of the CFQ-R-8D compared to the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in people with cystic fibrosis.
Mukuria C; Rowen D; Acaster S; McGarry LJ; Lou Y; Sosnay PR; Quittner AL
J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2024 Feb; 8(1):24. PubMed ID: 38416239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are condition-specific utilities more valid than generic preference-based ones in asthma? Evidence from a study comparing EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D with AQL-5D.
Kontodimopoulos N; Stamatopoulou E; Brinia A; Talias MA; Ferreira LN
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2018 Dec; 18(6):667-675. PubMed ID: 30048194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D, and comparison of their psychometric properties in a spinal postoperative Spanish population.
Selva-Sevilla C; Ferrara P; Gerónimo-Pardo M
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):649-662. PubMed ID: 32065301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of health-related quality of life in individuals with depressive symptoms: validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D.
Stolz M; Albus C; Beutel ME; Deter HC; Fritzsche K; Herrmann-Lingen C; Michal M; Petrowski K; Ronel J; Schultz JH; Söllner W; Weber C; de Zwaan M; Krauth C
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Nov; 24(8):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 36385438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of EuroQol-5D-3L and Short Form-6D Utility Scores in Family Caregivers of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China.
Sun CY; Liu Y; Zhou LR; Wang MS; Zhao XM; Huang WD; Liu GX; Zhang X
Front Public Health; 2021; 9():742332. PubMed ID: 34660519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in the general population of Chengdu city in China.
Zhao L; Liu X; Liu D; He Y; Liu Z; Li N
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(11):e14719. PubMed ID: 30882636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
Li N; Boonen A; van den Bergh JP; van Kuijk SMJ; Wyers CE; van Oostwaard M; Vranken L; Bours SPG; Hiligsmann M
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):829-839. PubMed ID: 35674412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Responsiveness and minimally important difference of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Harvie HS; Honeycutt AA; Neuwahl SJ; Barber MD; Richter HE; Visco AG; Sung VW; Shepherd JP; Rogers RG; Jakus-Waldman S; Mazloomdoost D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):265.e1-265.e11. PubMed ID: 30471259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Generic and Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures in Epilepsy: EQ-5D-3L and NEWQOL-6D.
Mulhern B; Pink J; Rowen D; Borghs S; Butt T; Hughes D; Marson A; Brazier J
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):687-693. PubMed ID: 28408012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised-8 Dimensions: Estimating Utilities From the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised.
Acaster S; Mukuria C; Rowen D; Brazier JE; Wainwright CE; Quon BS; Duckers J; Quittner AL; Lou Y; Sosnay PR; McGarry LJ
Value Health; 2023 Apr; 26(4):567-578. PubMed ID: 36509366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF EQ-5D-3L AND SF-6D INSTRUMENTS IN A SPANISH PARKINSON´S DISEASE POPULATION SAMPLE.
Garcia-Gordillo MÁ; Del Pozo-Cruz B; Adsuar JC; Cordero-Ferrera JM; Abellan-Perpiñan JM; Sanchez-Martinez FI
Nutr Hosp; 2015 Dec; 32(6):2808-21. PubMed ID: 26667738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D quality of life (QOL) questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undergoing lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).
Thuppal S; Markwell S; Crabtree T; Hazelrigg S
Qual Life Res; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1885-1892. PubMed ID: 30707368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An empirical evaluation of the SF-12, SF-6D, EQ-5D and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the hand.
Dritsaki M; Petrou S; Williams M; Lamb SE
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Jan; 15(1):20. PubMed ID: 28118833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of the psychometric properties of generic utility measures in multiple sclerosis.
Kuspinar A; Mayo NE
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Aug; 32(8):759-73. PubMed ID: 24846760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in Pompe disease.
Kanters TA; Redekop WK; Kruijshaar ME; van der Ploeg AT; Rutten-van Mölken MP; Hakkaart L
Qual Life Res; 2015 Apr; 24(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 25342117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responsiveness and convergent validity of QLU-C10D and EQ-5D-3L in assessing short-term quality of life following esophagectomy.
Bulamu NB; Vissapragada R; Chen G; Ratcliffe J; Mudge LA; Smithers BM; Isenring EA; Smith L; Jamieson GG; Watson DI;
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Oct; 19(1):233. PubMed ID: 34600554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the Psychometric Performance of Generic Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments in Children and Adolescents with ADHD, Anxiety and/or Depression.
O'Loughlin R; Jones R; Chen G; Mulhern B; Hiscock H; Devlin N; Dalziel K;
Pharmacoeconomics; 2024 Jun; 42(Suppl 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 38329689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery.
Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):501-511. PubMed ID: 31902023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
