131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38416430)
1. Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer.
Plante M; Kwon JS; Ferguson S; Samouëlian V; Ferron G; Maulard A; de Kroon C; Van Driel W; Tidy J; Williamson K; Mahner S; Kommoss S; Goffin F; Tamussino K; Eyjólfsdóttir B; Kim JW; Gleeson N; Brotto L; Tu D; Shepherd LE; ;
N Engl J Med; 2024 Feb; 390(9):819-829. PubMed ID: 38416430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
Casarin J; Bogani G; Papadia A; Ditto A; Pinelli C; Garzon S; Donadello N; Laganà AS; Cromi A; Mueller M; Raspagliesi F; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 32320800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intratumoral lymphatic vessel density and clinicopathologic features of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.
Zaganelli FL; Carvalho FM; Almeida BG; Bacchi CE; Goes JC; Calil MA; Baracat EC; Carvalho JP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1225-31. PubMed ID: 21135594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
Frumovitz M; Obermair A; Coleman RL; Pareja R; Lopez A; Ribero R; Isla D; Rendon G; Bernardini MQ; Buda A; Moretti-Marquez R; Zevallos A; Vieira MA; Zhu T; Land RP; Nicklin J; Asher R; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Ramirez PT
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):851-860. PubMed ID: 32502445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of postoperative bladder function and prognosis after modified nerve sparing radical hysterectomy].
Wenwen W; Bin L; Jing Z; Gongyi Z; Yeduo Y; Hongmei Z; Xiaoguang L; Lingying W
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 25030730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.
Hwang WY; Kim JH; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):975-980. PubMed ID: 32467336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical pathologic factors that predict recurrence in stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes.
Samlal RA; van der Velden J; Ten Kate FJ; Schilthuis MS; Hart AA; Lammes FB
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 80(7):1234-40. PubMed ID: 9317173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Re-classification of uterine cervical cancer cases treated with radical hysterectomy based on the 2018 FIGO staging system.
Osaku D; Komatsu H; Okawa M; Iida Y; Sato S; Oishi T; Harada T
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1054-1058. PubMed ID: 34794737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence of urodynamic factors on urinary retention in patients with cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy].
Chen XJ; Song YY; Cai LZ; Du KH; Lin CQ; Su YZ; Yu J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Sep; 45(9):677-81. PubMed ID: 21092548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective analysis for predictors of parametrial involvement in IB cervical cancer.
Kubota S; Kobayashi E; Kakuda M; Matsuzaki S; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Kimura T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Mar; 45(3):679-685. PubMed ID: 30565810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery.
Bean LM; Ward KK; Plaxe SC; McHale MT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):332.e1-332.e6. PubMed ID: 28522318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
