145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38416890)
41. Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.
Watanabe AT; Lim V; Vu HX; Chim R; Weise E; Liu J; Bradley WG; Comstock CE
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):625-637. PubMed ID: 31011956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Positive Predictive Values of Abnormality Scores From a Commercial Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Mammography.
Lee SE; Hong H; Kim EK
Korean J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 25(4):343-350. PubMed ID: 38528692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. An individual participant data meta-analysis of breast cancer detection and recall rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography population screening.
Libesman S; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S; Seidler AL; Bernardi D; Lång K; Robledo KP; Houssami N
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(5):e647-e654. PubMed ID: 35246389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hussein H; Abbas E; Keshavarzi S; Fazelzad R; Bukhanov K; Kulkarni S; Au F; Ghai S; Alabousi A; Freitas V
Radiology; 2023 Mar; 306(3):e221785. PubMed ID: 36719288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Why Start Now? Retrospective Study Evaluating Baseline Screening Mammography in Patients Age 60 and Older.
Chieh AY; Willis JG; Carroll CM; Mobley AA; Li Y; Li M; Woodard S
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2024; 53(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 37704485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Tan T; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2019 Sep; 111(9):916-922. PubMed ID: 30834436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Tomosynthesis with synthesised two-dimensional mammography yields higher cancer detection compared to digital mammography alone, also in dense breasts and in younger women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Jänsch A; Hacker A; Weinand S; Vogelmann T
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 152():110324. PubMed ID: 35576720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Artificial Intelligence for breast cancer detection: Technology, challenges, and prospects.
Díaz O; Rodríguez-Ruíz A; Sechopoulos I
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 175():111457. PubMed ID: 38640824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Cochon LR; Giess CS; Khorasani R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Aug; 17(8):999-1003. PubMed ID: 32068009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis - 4 year experience and comparison with national data.
Pan HB; Wong KF; Yao A; Hsu GC; Chou CP; Liang HL; Huang JS; Li HJ; Wang SC; Yang TL
J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 81(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 29129518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Improving the Performance of Radiologists Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection Support Software for Mammography: A Multi-Reader Study.
Lee JH; Kim KH; Lee EH; Ahn JS; Ryu JK; Park YM; Shin GW; Kim YJ; Choi HY
Korean J Radiol; 2022 May; 23(5):505-516. PubMed ID: 35434976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Recall and False-Positive Rates by Time of Day and Reader Experience.
Bernstein MH; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 35014905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Impact of switching from digital mammography to tomosynthesis plus digital mammography on breast cancer screening in Alberta, Canada.
Pang JX; Newsome J; Sun M; Chiang B; Mutti-Packer S; McDonald SW; Yang H
J Med Screen; 2022 Mar; 29(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 34266324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Use of Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Unnecessary Recalls at Screening Mammography: A Simulation Study.
Kim YS; Jang MJ; Lee SH; Kim SY; Ha SM; Kwon BR; Moon WK; Chang JM
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Dec; 23(12):1241-1250. PubMed ID: 36447412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Breast cancer detection accuracy of AI in an entire screening population: a retrospective, multicentre study.
Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Graumann O; Nielsen M; Lång K; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Rasmussen BSB
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Dec; 23(1):127. PubMed ID: 38124111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. New Horizons: Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Goldberg JE; Reig B; Lewin AA; Gao Y; Heacock L; Heller SL; Moy L
Radiographics; 2023 Jan; 43(1):e220060. PubMed ID: 36331878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
