These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38416918)

  • 1. Prospective Evaluation of the Cost of Performing Breast Imaging Examinations Using a Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Method: A Single-Center Study.
    Ali A; Phillips J; Ljuboja D; Shehab S; Pisano ED; Kaplan RS; Sarwar A
    J Breast Imaging; 2023 Sep; 5(5):546-554. PubMed ID: 38416918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.
    Sharma N; McMahon M; Haigh I; Chen Y; Dall BJG
    Radiology; 2019 May; 291(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 30888932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
    Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
    Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
    Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeat Screening Outcomes with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthetic Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: Results from the Prospective Verona Pilot Study.
    Caumo F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Brunelli S; Bricolo P; Cugola L; Gennaro G
    Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 33170101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utility of MRI-Directed Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Biopsy Planning for Suspicious MRI-Detected Breast Lesions.
    Nida BA; Rooney TB; Miller MM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 36000664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of MRI-detected lesions on screening tomosynthesis in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
    Choudhery S; Polley E; Conners AL
    Clin Imaging; 2020 Jan; 59(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 31760277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.
    Mango VL; Goel A; Mema E; Kwak E; Ha R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 30632645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Chikarmane SA; Cochon LR; Khorasani R; Sahu S; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):587-594. PubMed ID: 32966113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment.
    Giess CS; Pourjabbar S; Ip IK; Lacson R; Alper E; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):929-934. PubMed ID: 28639832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies.
    Nguyen DL; Boron A; Oluyemi ET; Myers KS; Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):212-223. PubMed ID: 36102725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Outcomes for One-View Asymmetries Recalled From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening Examinations.
    Gong AJ; Nguyen DL; Lee EE; Mullen LA; Myers KS; Oluyemi E; Ambinder EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):724-733. PubMed ID: 35703412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Astengo D; Airaldi S; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Feb; 138(1):311-7. PubMed ID: 23338763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic evaluation of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities to mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate breast cancer risk in US healthcare.
    Blankenburg M; Sánchez-Collado I; Soyemi BO; Åkerborg Ö; Caleyachetty A; Harris J; Morris E; Newstead G; Lobig F
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):850-861. PubMed ID: 37278659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
    Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus MRI as an Adjunct to Full-Field Digital Mammography for Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer according to Mammographic Density.
    Kim H; Yang SY; Ahn JH; Ko EY; Ko ES; Han BK; Choi JS
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 36126953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.