These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38416918)

  • 21. Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.
    Kuhl CK; Keulers A; Strobel K; Schneider H; Gaisa N; Schrading S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 29426360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Initial experience with combination digital breast tomosynthesis plus full field digital mammography or full field digital mammography alone in the screening environment.
    Destounis S; Arieno A; Morgan R
    J Clin Imaging Sci; 2014; 4():9. PubMed ID: 24744966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Benefits of digital breast tomosynthesis: A lesion-level analysis.
    Amir T; Ambinder EB; Harvey SC; Oluyemi ET; Jones MK; Honig E; Alvin MD; Mullen LA
    J Med Screen; 2021 Sep; 28(3):311-317. PubMed ID: 33334233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Imaging characteristics of interval cancers detected on Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).
    Majid SZ; Senapati GM; Lacson R; Chikarmane SA; Giess CS
    Clin Imaging; 2024 Mar; 107():110063. PubMed ID: 38232642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
    Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
    Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance of Screening Breast MRI After Negative Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus After Negative Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women at Higher Than Average Risk for Breast Cancer.
    Roark AA; Dang PA; Niell BL; Halpern EF; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 30540208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Imaging Features and Biopsy Techniques.
    Horvat JV; Keating DM; Rodrigues-Duarte H; Morris EA; Mango VL
    Radiographics; 2019; 39(2):307-318. PubMed ID: 30681901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Cost-Effectiveness of Using Private and Medicare Insurance in Community-Based Health Care Facilities.
    Hunter SA; Morris C; Nelson K; Snyder BJ; Poulton TB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1171-1175. PubMed ID: 28177646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are contrast enhanced mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis equally effective in diagnosing patients recalled from breast cancer screening?
    Siminiak N; Pasiuk-Czepczyńska A; Godlewska A; Wojtyś P; Olejnik M; Michalak J; Nowaczyk P; Gajdzis P; Godlewski D; Ruchała M; Czepczyński R
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():941312. PubMed ID: 36505843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic value of the stand-alone synthetic image in digital breast tomosynthesis examinations.
    Garayoa J; Chevalier M; Castillo M; Mahillo-Fernández I; Amallal El Ouahabi N; Estrada C; Tejerina A; Benitez O; Valverde J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):565-572. PubMed ID: 28812190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced 2D mammography in everyday clinical use.
    Neeter LMFH; Raat HPJ; Meens-Koreman SD; van Stiphout RSA; Timmermans SMEC; Duvivier KM; Smidt ML; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ; Lobbes MBI
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22224. PubMed ID: 34782698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surveillance Mammography After Breast Conservation Therapy: Is Tomosynthesis Worth It?
    Hasan S; Gresswell S; Colosimo B; Weinberger K; Anderson S; Abel S; Bigbee M; Shindel B; Hilton C; Julian T; Trombetta M
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Aug; 42(8):682-686. PubMed ID: 31313678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
    Dang PA; Wang A; Senapati GM; Ip IK; Lacson R; Khorasani R; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):701-706. PubMed ID: 31613659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency and Outcomes of BI-RADS Category 3 Assessments in Patients With a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Offit LR; Chikarmane SA; Lacson RC; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Sep; 221(3):313-322. PubMed ID: 37095672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective Trial.
    Sumkin JH; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Catullo VJ; Zuley ML; Shinde DD; Hakim CM; Bandos AI; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1477-82. PubMed ID: 26391857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening.
    Son D; Phillips J; Mehta TS; Mehta R; Brook A; Dialani VM
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S229-S238. PubMed ID: 33846061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of the systematic introduction of tomosynthesis on breast biopsies: 10 years of results.
    La Forgia D; Signorile R; Bove S; Arezzo F; Cormio G; Daniele A; Dellino M; Fanizzi A; Gatta G; Lafranceschina M; Massafra R; Rizzo A; Zito FA; Neri E; Faggioni L
    Radiol Med; 2023 Jun; 128(6):704-713. PubMed ID: 37198373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.