164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38416959)
21. Automated Three-dimensional Breast US for Screening: Technique, Artifacts, and Lesion Characterization.
van Zelst JCM; Mann RM
Radiographics; 2018; 38(3):663-683. PubMed ID: 29624482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Okello J; Kisembo H; Bugeza S; Galukande M
BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 14():41. PubMed ID: 25547239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Glandular Tissue Component and Breast Cancer Risk in Mammographically Dense Breasts at Screening Breast US.
Lee SH; Ryu HS; Jang MJ; Yi A; Ha SM; Kim SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2021 Oct; 301(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 34282967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A computer-aided diagnosis system using artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound: Added value for the inexperienced breast radiologist.
Park HJ; Kim SM; La Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Jang JY; Lee JY; Lee SH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(3):e14146. PubMed ID: 30653149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Automated breast ultrasound: Supplemental screening for average-risk women with dense breasts.
Spear GG; Mendelson EB
Clin Imaging; 2021 Aug; 76():15-25. PubMed ID: 33548888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hussein H; Abbas E; Keshavarzi S; Fazelzad R; Bukhanov K; Kulkarni S; Au F; Ghai S; Alabousi A; Freitas V
Radiology; 2023 Mar; 306(3):e221785. PubMed ID: 36719288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Artificial intelligence in breast imaging.
Le EPV; Wang Y; Huang Y; Hickman S; Gilbert FJ
Clin Radiol; 2019 May; 74(5):357-366. PubMed ID: 30898381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Supplemental Screening for Patients at Intermediate and High Risk for Breast Cancer.
Wang L; Strigel RM
Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):67-83. PubMed ID: 33223001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mammography, US, and MR Imaging: short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old women.
Venturini E; Losio C; Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; Fedele I; Tacchini S; Schiani E; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Panzeri MM; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A
Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 23579052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Screening Mammography, From the
Lamb LR; Lehman CD; Gastounioti A; Conant EF; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):369-380. PubMed ID: 35018795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Review of Supplemental Screening Ultrasound for Breast Cancer: Certain Populations of Women with Dense Breast Tissue May Benefit.
Burkett BJ; Hanemann CW
Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1604-1609. PubMed ID: 27374700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast cancer screening controversies: who, when, why, and how?
Chetlen A; Mack J; Chan T
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 26093511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Role of Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening: The Case for and Against Ultrasound.
Geisel J; Raghu M; Hooley R
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2018 Feb; 39(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 29317037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Overview of radiomics in breast cancer diagnosis and prognostication.
Tagliafico AS; Piana M; Schenone D; Lai R; Massone AM; Houssami N
Breast; 2020 Feb; 49():74-80. PubMed ID: 31739125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pearls and Pitfalls of Interpretation of Automated Breast US.
Huppe AI; Inciardi MF; Aripoli AM; Peterson JK; Smith CB; Winblad OD
Radiographics; 2023 Oct; 43(10):e230023. PubMed ID: 37792592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Screening Outcomes of Supplemental Automated Breast US in Asian Women with Dense and Nondense Breasts.
Kwon MR; Choi JS; Lee MY; Kim S; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222435. PubMed ID: 37097135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
