126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38416967)
1. The Challenge of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Detected Architectural Distortion of the Breast: Inter-reader Variability and Imaging Characteristics That May Improve Positive Predictive Value.
Feliciano-Rivera YZ; Net J; Velamuri S; Pluguez-Turull C; Yepes MM
J Breast Imaging; 2022 Jun; 4(3):263-272. PubMed ID: 38416967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.
Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital tomosynthesis spot view in architectural distortions: outcomes in management and radiation dose.
Fiaschetti V; Ubaldi N; De Fazio S; Ricci A; Maspes F; Cossu E
Radiol Med; 2023 Jan; 128(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 36534241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the Positive Predictive Value of Architectural Distortion Detected with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in BI-RADS 4 Cases.
Dou E; Ksepka M; Dodelzon K; Shingala PY; Katzen JT
J Breast Imaging; 2020 Nov; 2(6):552-560. PubMed ID: 38424858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tomosynthesis-Detected Architectural Distortions: Correlations between Imaging Characteristics and Histopathologic Outcomes.
Romanucci G; Fornasa F; Caneva A; Rossati C; Mandarà M; Tommasini O; Rella R
J Imaging; 2023 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37233322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Architectural distortion outcome: digital breast tomosynthesis-detected versus digital mammography-detected.
Ahmed SA; Samy M; Ali AM; Hassan RA
Radiol Med; 2022 Jan; 127(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 34665431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive Predictive Value of Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsies of Architectural Distortions Seen on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and without an Ultrasound Correlate.
Vijayaraghavan GR; Newburg A; Vedantham S
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2019; 9():53. PubMed ID: 31819830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review.
Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Malignant Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Choudhery S; Johnson MP; Larson NB; Anderson T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 32966111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management.
Pujara AC; Hui J; Wang LC
Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():133-137. PubMed ID: 30639524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy.
Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Architectural Distortion on Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Pathologic Outcomes and Indicators of Malignancy.
Wadhwa A; Majidi SS; Cherian S; Dykstra DS; Deitch SG; Hansen C; Bhave S; Koch KM
J Breast Imaging; 2021 Jan; 3(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 38424835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Bahl M; Lamb LR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 28834441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathological outcome of sonographically occult architectural distortions (AD) visible only on digital breast tomosynthesis, and comparison with AD visible also on 2D mammography.
Linda A; Tarricone R; Londero V; Girometti R; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 146():110075. PubMed ID: 34864616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome of Architectural Distortion Detected Only at Breast Tomosynthesis versus 2D Mammography.
Alshafeiy TI; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Nicholson BT; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29584593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis mammograms in symptomatic breast clinics: What are the result outcomes?
Bansal GJ; Kale R
Br J Radiol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38745365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Wang LC; Philip M; Bhole S; Rao S; Gupta D; Schacht D; Friedewald SM; Anders R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 35895298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative Staging in Breast Cancer: Intraindividual Comparison of Unenhanced MRI Combined With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI.
Rizzo V; Moffa G; Kripa E; Caramanico C; Pediconi F; Galati F
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():661945. PubMed ID: 34017683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Outcomes for One-View Asymmetries Recalled From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening Examinations.
Gong AJ; Nguyen DL; Lee EE; Mullen LA; Myers KS; Oluyemi E; Ambinder EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):724-733. PubMed ID: 35703412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
