147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38417254)
1. Head-to-head comparison of American, European, and Asian TIRADSs in thyroid nodule assessment: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Piticchio T; Russ G; Radzina M; Frasca F; Durante C; Trimboli P
Eur Thyroid J; 2024 Apr; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38417254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Performance of Different Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (Kwak-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS) for Risk Stratification of Small Thyroid Nodules (≤10 mm).
Schenke S; Klett R; Seifert P; Kreissl MC; Görges R; Zimny M
J Clin Med; 2020 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 31963140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification Systems: Comparison of ACR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, K-TIRADS, and ATA Guidelines.
Yucel S; Balci IG; Tomak L
Ultrasound Q; 2023 Dec; 39(4):206-211. PubMed ID: 37918114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound Assessment of Autonomous Thyroid Nodules before and after Radioiodine Therapy Using Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS).
Schenke SA; Wuestemann J; Zimny M; Kreissl MC
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33276695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validating and Comparing C-TIRADS, K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS in Stratifying the Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules.
Chen Q; Lin M; Wu S
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():899575. PubMed ID: 35784558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of thyroid imaging reporting and data system category 4 or 5 for diagnosing malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim DH; Chung SR; Choi SH; Kim KW
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5611-5624. PubMed ID: 32356157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Six Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Kim DH; Kim SW; Basurrah MA; Lee J; Hwang SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jun; 220(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 36752367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of 665 thyroid nodules using both EU-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS classification systems.
Borges AP; Antunes C; Caseiro-Alves F; Donato P
Thyroid Res; 2023 May; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 37150822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Yang L; Li C; Chen Z; He S; Wang Z; Liu J
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1227339. PubMed ID: 37720531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FNA indication according to ACR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS and K-TIRADS in thyroid incidentalomas at
Trimboli P; Knappe L; Treglia G; Ruberto T; Piccardo A; Ceriani L; Paone G; Giovanella L
J Endocrinol Invest; 2020 Nov; 43(11):1607-1612. PubMed ID: 32270410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the efficacy of EU-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS in risk stratification of pediatric patients with thyroid nodules.
Tuli G; Munarin J; Scollo M; Quaglino F; De Sanctis L
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1041464. PubMed ID: 36482990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences among the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System proposed by Korean, the American College of Radiology and the European Thyroid Association in the diagnostic performance of thyroid nodules.
Shi YX; Chen L; Liu YC; Zhan J; Diao XH; Fang L; Chen Y
Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Aug; 9(8):4958-4967. PubMed ID: 35117857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unnecessary thyroid nodule biopsy rates under four ultrasound risk stratification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim PH; Suh CH; Baek JH; Chung SR; Choi YJ; Lee JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2877-2885. PubMed ID: 33057762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Summary of Meta-analyses of Studies Involving TIRADS Classifications (EU-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and K-TIRADS) in Evaluating the Malignant Potential of Focal Lesions of The Thyroid Gland.
Dobruch-Sobczak K; Adamczewski Z; Dedecjus M; Lewiński A; Migda B; Ruchała M; Skowrońska-Szcześniak A; Szczepanek-Parulska E; Zajkowska K; Żyłka A
J Ultrason; 2022 Apr; 22(89):121-129. PubMed ID: 35811588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of adult-based ATA and ACR-TIRADS ultrasound risk stratification systems in pediatric thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim PH; Yoon HM; Hwang J; Lee JS; Jung AY; Cho YA; Baek JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7450-7463. PubMed ID: 33864505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Performance of Four Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kim PH; Suh CH; Baek JH; Chung SR; Choi YJ; Lee JH
Thyroid; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 32303153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Joo L; Lee MK; Lee JY; Ha EJ; Na DG
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul); 2023 Feb; 38(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 36891658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ultrasound risk stratification systems for thyroid nodule have been evaluated against papillary carcinoma. A meta-analysis.
Trimboli P; Castellana M; Piccardo A; Romanelli F; Grani G; Giovanella L; Durante C
Rev Endocr Metab Disord; 2021 Jun; 22(2):453-460. PubMed ID: 32959174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of perinodular stiffness in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.
Hu L; Liu X; Pei C; Xie L; He N
Endocr Connect; 2021 May; 10(5):492-501. PubMed ID: 33878732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Thyroid Risk Categorization Systems and Fine-Needle Aspiration Recommendations in a Multi-Institutional Thyroid Ultrasound Registry.
Hoang JK; Middleton WD; Langer JE; Schmidt K; Gillis LB; Nair SS; Watts JA; Snyder RW; Khot R; Rawal U; Tessler FN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1605-1613. PubMed ID: 34419476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
