These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38417266)

  • 1. When does infrastructure hybridisation outperform centralised infrastructure paradigms? - Exploring economic and hydraulic impacts of decentralised urban wastewater system expansion.
    Duque N; Scholten L; Maurer M
    Water Res; 2024 May; 254():121327. PubMed ID: 38417266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring transitions of sewer wastewater infrastructure towards decentralisation using the modular model TURN-Sewers.
    Duque N; Scholten L; Maurer M
    Water Res; 2024 Jun; 257():121640. PubMed ID: 38776755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economies of density for on-site waste water treatment.
    Eggimann S; Truffer B; Maurer M
    Water Res; 2016 Sep; 101():476-489. PubMed ID: 27295622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying life cycle assessment to assess the environmental performance of decentralised versus centralised wastewater systems.
    Risch E; Boutin C; Roux P
    Water Res; 2021 May; 196():116991. PubMed ID: 33735623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Centralised, decentralised or hybrid sanitation systems? Economic evaluation under urban development uncertainty and phased expansion.
    Roefs I; Meulman B; Vreeburg JHG; Spiller M
    Water Res; 2017 Feb; 109():274-286. PubMed ID: 27914258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To connect or not to connect? Modelling the optimal degree of centralisation for wastewater infrastructures.
    Eggimann S; Truffer B; Maurer M
    Water Res; 2015 Nov; 84():218-31. PubMed ID: 26247101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the impact of transitions from centralised to decentralised water solutions on existing infrastructures--integrated city-scale analysis with VIBe.
    Sitzenfrei R; Möderl M; Rauch W
    Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(20):7251-63. PubMed ID: 24210508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semi-centralised supply and treatment systems for (fast growing) urban areas.
    Weber B; Cornel P; Wagner M
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(1-2):349-56. PubMed ID: 17305159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater systems: Quantifying the relative contribution of sewer systems.
    Risch E; Gutierrez O; Roux P; Boutin C; Corominas L
    Water Res; 2015 Jun; 77():35-48. PubMed ID: 25839834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decentralised urban water reuse: the implications of system scale for cost and pathogen risk.
    Fane SA; Ashbolt NJ; White SB
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):281-8. PubMed ID: 12381002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance assessment of water reuse strategies using integrated framework of urban water metabolism and water-energy-pollution nexus.
    Landa-Cansigno O; Behzadian K; Davila-Cano DI; Campos LC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Feb; 27(5):4582-4597. PubMed ID: 31129899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monitoring and validation of decentralised water and wastewater systems for increased uptake.
    Sharma AK; Cook S; Chong MN
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(11):2576-81. PubMed ID: 23752391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The development and application of improved solids modelling to enable resilient urban sewer networks.
    Murali MK; Hipsey MR; Ghadouani A; Yuan Z
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jun; 240():219-230. PubMed ID: 30947090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing and optimizing the hydrological performance of Grey-Green infrastructure systems in response to climate change and non-stationary time series.
    Wang M; Liu M; Zhang D; Qi J; Fu W; Zhang Y; Rao Q; Bakhshipour AE; Tan SK
    Water Res; 2023 Apr; 232():119720. PubMed ID: 36774753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Harmonized assessment of nutrient pollution from urban systems including losses from sewer exfiltration: a case study in Germany.
    Nguyen HH; Venohr M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(45):63878-63893. PubMed ID: 33495958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Centralised versus decentralised wastewater systems?
    Orth H
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):259-66. PubMed ID: 17881860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Life-cycle energy impacts for adapting an urban water supply system to droughts.
    Lam KL; Stokes-Draut JR; Horvath A; Lane JL; Kenway SJ; Lant PA
    Water Res; 2017 Dec; 127():139-149. PubMed ID: 29035767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Centralised versus decentralised treatment and disposal options for Küçükçekmece Basin of Istanbul city.
    Eroğlu V; Sarikaya HZ; Yüksel E; Koyuncu I
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):371-8. PubMed ID: 12381014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost effectiveness of decentralised care model for managing MDR-TB in India.
    John D; Chatterjee P; Murthy S; Bhat R; Musa BM
    Indian J Tuberc; 2018 Jul; 65(3):208-217. PubMed ID: 29933862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impacts from urban water systems on receiving waters - How to account for severe wet-weather events in LCA?
    Risch E; Gasperi J; Gromaire MC; Chebbo G; Azimi S; Rocher V; Roux P; Rosenbaum RK; Sinfort C
    Water Res; 2018 Jan; 128():412-423. PubMed ID: 29156311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.