110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3841817)
1. 3-D femoral stress analysis using CT scans and p-version FEM.
Basu PK; Beall AG; Simmons DJ; Vannier M
Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1985-1986; 13(3-4):163-86. PubMed ID: 3841817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Automatic generation of 3-D finite element codes of the human femur].
Lengsfeld M; Kaminsky J; Merz B; Franke RP
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1994 May; 39(5):117-22. PubMed ID: 8049341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subject-specific finite element simulation of the human femur considering inhomogeneous material properties: a straightforward method and convergence study.
Hölzer A; Schröder C; Woiczinski M; Sadoghi P; Scharpf A; Heimkes B; Jansson V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 23084242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomical comparison and evaluation of human proximal femurs modeling via different devices and FEM analysis.
Verim Ö; Taşgetiren S; Er MS; Timur M; Yuran AF
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):e19-24. PubMed ID: 22711421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated finite element analysis of excised human femora based on precision -QCT.
Merz B; Niederer P; Müller R; Rüegsegger P
J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 8872261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite-element modeling of bones from CT data: sensitivity to geometry and material uncertainties.
Taddei F; Martelli S; Reggiani B; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2194-200. PubMed ID: 17073324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Use of voxel-oriented femur models for stress analysis. Generation, calculation and validation of CT-based FEM models].
Schmitt J; Lengsfeld M; Alter P; Leppek R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1995 Jun; 40(6):175-81. PubMed ID: 7632871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
Viceconti M; Bellingeri L; Cristofolini L; Toni A
Med Eng Phys; 1998 Jan; 20(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9664280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: a new method.
Keyak JH; Meagher JM; Skinner HB; Mote CD
J Biomed Eng; 1990 Sep; 12(5):389-97. PubMed ID: 2214726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the 3-D shape and mechanics of the proximal femur using a shape template and a bone mineral density image.
Väänänen SP; Isaksson H; Julkunen P; Sirola J; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 20809392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of poor distal contact of the femoral component of a cementless hip endoprosthesis.
Taylor M; Abel EW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1993; 207(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 7802877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of geometry-based and CT voxel-based finite element modelling and experimental validation.
Lengsfeld M; Schmitt J; Alter P; Kaminsky J; Leppek R
Med Eng Phys; 1998 Oct; 20(7):515-22. PubMed ID: 9832027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating accurate FE models of the femur and pelvis.
Shim VB; Pitto RP; Streicher RM; Hunter PJ; Anderson IA
J Biomech; 2007; 40(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 16427645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments.
Yosibash Z; Padan R; Joskowicz L; Milgrom C
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Jun; 129(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 17536896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Musculoskeletal-based finite element analysis of femur after total hip replacement.
Meena VK; Kumar M; Pundir A; Singh S; Goni V; Kalra P; Sinha RK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jun; 230(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 27006421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Establishment of femoral 3D finite element model and validation of injury biomechanics].
Zou DH; Li ZD; Huang P; Liu NG; Chen YJ
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 27(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 21913549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A new method to reconstruct the spatial structure of human proximal femur and establishment of the finite element model].
Ma X; Fu X; Ma J; Zhao Y; Wang T; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Dong B; Yang Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 21485187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The finite cell method for bone simulations: verification and validation.
Ruess M; Tal D; Trabelsi N; Yosibash Z; Rank E
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Mar; 11(3-4):425-37. PubMed ID: 21695444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical finite element model for bone shape and biomechanical properties.
Belenguer Querol L; Büchler P; Rueckert D; Nolte LP; González Ballester MA
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):405-11. PubMed ID: 17354916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis of a femur to deconstruct the paradox of bone curvature.
Jade S; Tamvada KH; Strait DS; Grosse IR
J Theor Biol; 2014 Jan; 341():53-63. PubMed ID: 24099719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
