These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38418805)

  • 1. Dual-task interference: Bottleneck constraint or capacity sharing? Evidence from automatic and controlled processes.
    Wu Y; Wang Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):815-827. PubMed ID: 38418805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.
    Maquestiaux F; Laguë-Beauvais M; Ruthruff E; Bherer L
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1262-82. PubMed ID: 18927042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?
    Ruthruff E; Hazeltine E; Remington RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 16184395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 8189196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Localizing semantic interference from distractor sounds in picture naming: A dual-task study.
    Mädebach A; Kieseler ML; Jescheniak JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1909-1916. PubMed ID: 29030759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the automaticity of semantic processing during task switching.
    Vachon F; Jolicœur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):611-26. PubMed ID: 21981671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 23895445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new semantic vigilance task: vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual-task costs.
    Epling SL; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 26403293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonautomatic emotion perception in a dual-task situation.
    Tomasik D; Ruthruff E; Allen PA; Lien MC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 19293095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating dual-task interference in children versus young adults with the overlapping task paradigm.
    Strobach T; Karbach J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Sep; 197():104866. PubMed ID: 32531496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1279-1293. PubMed ID: 36107664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Fischer R; Schubert T
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 18549168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ideomotor compatibility enables automatic response selection.
    Maquestiaux F; Lyphout-Spitz M; Ruthruff E; Arexis M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):742-750. PubMed ID: 32323163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using response time modeling to understand the sources of dual-task interference in a dynamic environment.
    Palada H; Neal A; Strayer D; Ballard T; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1331-1345. PubMed ID: 31282694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timing and executive resources: dual-task interference patterns between temporal production and shifting, updating, and inhibition tasks.
    Brown SW; Collier SA; Night JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):947-63. PubMed ID: 23127475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.