These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38420655)

  • 1. Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index Should not be Utilized to Determine Surgical Eligibility for Patients Requiring Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease.
    Issa TZ; Haider AA; Lambrechts MJ; Sherman MB; Canseco JA; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD; Kepler CK; Hilibrand AS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Jul; 49(14):965-972. PubMed ID: 38420655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.
    Asher AL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Nian H; Dittus RS; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Glassman SD; Bydon M; Archer KR; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 26989974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Poor muscle health and low preoperative ODI are independent predictors for slower achievement of MCID after minimally invasive decompression.
    Singh S; Shahi P; Asada T; Kaidi A; Subramanian T; Zhao E; Kim AYE; Maayan O; Araghi K; Singh N; Tuma O; Korsun M; Kamil R; Sheha E; Dowdell J; Qureshi S; Iyer S
    Spine J; 2023 Aug; 23(8):1152-1160. PubMed ID: 37059307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reassessing the minimum 2-year follow-up standard after lumbar decompression surgery: a 2-month follow-up seems to be an acceptable minimum.
    Calek AK; Hochreiter B; Buckland AJ
    Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 38588722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Achievement of a Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability Is a Suitable Predictor of Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Fusion Patients.
    Geoghegan CE; Mohan S; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Jadczak CN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e94-e100. PubMed ID: 34023465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preoperative Disability Influences Effectiveness of MCID and PASS in Predicting Patient Improvement Following Lumbar Spine Surgery.
    Shahi P; Subramanian T; Maayan O; Araghi K; Singh N; Singh S; Asada T; Tuma O; Korsun M; Sheha E; Dowdell J; Qureshi SA; Iyer S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Dec; 36(10):E506-E511. PubMed ID: 37651575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis.
    Hijji FY; Narain AS; Bohl DD; Yom KH; Kudaravalli KT; Lopez GD; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):E92-E97. PubMed ID: 28538082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of achieving minimal clinically important difference in functional status for elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing lumbar decompression and fusion surgery.
    Hou X; Hu H; Cui P; Kong C; Wang W; Lu S
    BMC Surg; 2024 Feb; 24(1):59. PubMed ID: 38365668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.
    Song J; Araghi K; Dupont MM; Shahi P; Bovonratwet P; Shinn D; Dalal SS; Melissaridou D; Virk SS; Iyer S; Dowdell JE; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1677-1686. PubMed ID: 35671940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients.
    Fakurnejad S; Scheer JK; Lafage V; Smith JS; Deviren V; Hostin R; Mundis GM; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Kebaish K; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 26091440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining minimal clinically important difference estimates following surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: analysis of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry.
    Power JD; Perruccio AV; Canizares M; McIntosh G; Abraham E; Attabib N; Bailey CS; Charest-Morin R; Dea N; Finkelstein J; Fisher C; Glennie RA; Hall H; Johnson MG; Kelly AM; Kingwell S; Manson N; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Singh S; Soroceanu A; Thomas KC; Weber MH; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2023 Sep; 23(9):1323-1333. PubMed ID: 37160168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does clinical improvement of symptomatic degenerative lumbar disease impact obesity?
    Joseph JR; Farooqui Z; Smith BW; Kahn EN; Liu X; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):705-708. PubMed ID: 28362212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic factors associated with best outcomes (minimal symptom state) following fusion for lumbar degenerative conditions.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Gum JL; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):187-190. PubMed ID: 29960112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meeting Patient Expectations and Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability, Back Pain, and Leg Pain May Provide Predictive Utility for Achieving Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Decompression Patients.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Park GJ; Vanjani NN; Prabhu MC; Pawlowski H; Parsons AW; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e328-e335. PubMed ID: 35259504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Impact of Posterior Intervertebral Osteophytes on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Zhao E; Hirase T; Kim AG; Du JY; Amen TB; Araghi K; Subramanian T; Kamil R; Shahi P; Fourman MS; Asada T; Simon CZ; Singh N; Korsun M; Tuma OC; Zhang J; Lu AZ; Mai E; Kim AYE; Allen MRJ; Kwas C; Dowdell JE; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA; Iyer S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 May; 49(9):652-660. PubMed ID: 38193931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative patient-reported outcome score thresholds predict the likelihood of reaching MCID with surgical correction of adult spinal deformity.
    Leyton-Mange A; Truumees E; Bozic KJ; Singh D; Liu TC; Stokes JK; Mahometa MJ; Geck MJ
    Spine Deform; 2021 Jan; 9(1):207-219. PubMed ID: 32779122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Postoperative Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Yoo JS; Patel DS; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Mogilevsky FA; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jul; 33(6):E263-E268. PubMed ID: 31503049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.