These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3842138)
1. Speech reception thresholds using conventional vs high-frequency spondees in normals and in subjects with marked high-frequency sensorineural loss. Martin FN; Jansen RM J Aud Res; 1985 Apr; 25(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 3842138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Experiences with the distorted Freiburg Speech Test--diagnosis and rehabilitation of hearing disorders]. Dieroff HG; Mangoldt W Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):372-8. PubMed ID: 2765049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults. Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials. Van Tasell DJ; Yanz JL J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 3669644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative intelligibility of CID spondees for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Frank T J Aud Res; 1978 Apr; 18(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 753831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the cross hearing of spondaic words. Martin FN; Blythe ME J Aud Res; 1977 Oct; 17(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 617811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry. Hagerman B Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of procedures and materials for speech reception thresholds. Robinson DO; Koenigs MJ J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 4(6):227-30. PubMed ID: 511650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss. Kiliç MA; Ogüt F Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15244027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Part- vs full-list performance on the NST by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Danhauer JL; Brink TJ J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 3842838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-compressed spondaic words as a measure of speech reception threshold. Foltner KA; Beasley DS; White SC J Aud Res; 1979 Oct; 19(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 262461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds. Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-retest variability in testing hearing of speech. Hughes EC; Arthur RH; Johnson RL J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 511653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Sensorineural hearing loss in children starting school. Results of a representative hearing screening study]. Kruppa B; Dieroff HG; Ising H HNO; 1995 Jan; 43(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 7890549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study. Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners]. He LP Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of the Tillman-Olsen procedure for determination of spondee threshold using recorded and live voice presentations. Beattie RC; Forrester PW; Ruby BK J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 845071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]