These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38421794)

  • 1. On the timing of overt attention deployment: Eye-movement evidence for the priority accumulation framework.
    Toledano D; Sasi M; Yuval-Greenberg S; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 May; 50(5):431-450. PubMed ID: 38421794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial cueing effects do not always index attentional capture: evidence for a priority accumulation framework.
    Darnell M; Lamy D
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jul; 86(5):1547-1564. PubMed ID: 34613479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial cueing effects are not what we thought: On the timing of attentional deployment.
    Yaron I; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Jul; 47(7):946-962. PubMed ID: 34424025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search.
    Schmid RR; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):667-684. PubMed ID: 36460927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Allocation of attention across saccades.
    Jonikaitis D; Szinte M; Rolfs M; Cavanagh P
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Mar; 109(5):1425-34. PubMed ID: 23221410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similar effect of cueing conditions on attentional and saccadic temporal dynamics.
    Filali-Sadouk N; Castet E; Olivier E; Zenon A
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):21.1-13. PubMed ID: 20465340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Secondary capture: Salience information persistently drives attentional selection.
    Duncan DH; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Sep; 50(9):942-951. PubMed ID: 39146051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An attentional limbo: Saccades become momentarily non-selective in between saliency-driven and relevance-driven selection.
    van Heusden E; van Zoest W; Donk M; Olivers CNL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 35378672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prior target locations attract overt attention during search.
    Talcott TN; Gaspelin N
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104282. PubMed ID: 32387723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple reward-cue contingencies favor expectancy over uncertainty in shaping the reward-cue attentional salience.
    De Tommaso M; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):332-346. PubMed ID: 29372304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the link between attentional search and the oculomotor system: Is preattentive search restricted to the range of eye movements?
    Casteau S; Smith DT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):518-532. PubMed ID: 31942703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trading off stimulus salience for identity: A cueing approach to disentangle visual selection strategies.
    Paoletti D; Weaver MD; Braun C; van Zoest W
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt B):116-24. PubMed ID: 25152318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing recoding accounts of negative attentional templates using behavior and eye tracking.
    Zhang Z; Carlisle NB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):509-532. PubMed ID: 36548091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-saccadic shifts of visual attention.
    Harrison WJ; Mattingley JB; Remington RW
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45670. PubMed ID: 23029175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention capture by episodic long-term memory.
    Nickel AE; Hopkins LS; Minor GN; Hannula DE
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104312. PubMed ID: 32387722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture.
    Arnott SR; Pratt J; Shore DI; Alain C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):383-95. PubMed ID: 11689298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distorted gaze direction input to attentional priority map in spatial neglect.
    Balslev D; Odoj B
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():119-128. PubMed ID: 31128129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.