These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3842279)

  • 1. Measurements from digital scanned projection radiographs: couch detail and detector artefact removal by simple image enhancement.
    Moore CJ
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 58(692):756-9. PubMed ID: 3842279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image enhancement using computed radiography.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1990; 61(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 2326438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent technological advances in computed tomography and the clinical impact therein.
    Runge VM; Marquez H; Andreisek G; Valavanis A; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 25521851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric impact of a CT metal artefact suppression algorithm for proton, electron and photon therapies.
    Wei J; Sandison GA; Hsi WC; Ringor M; Lu X
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5183-97. PubMed ID: 17019032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Auto-shutter of CR/DR images and applications in the post-image processing of PACS].
    Gao BB; Zhang JG
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 30(2):106-8. PubMed ID: 16830801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical reconstruction for x-ray computed tomography using energy-integrating detectors.
    Lasio GM; Whiting BR; Williamson JF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2247-66. PubMed ID: 17404467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of digital unsharp masking and local contrast stretching as applied to chest radiographs.
    Rogowska J; Preston K; Sashin D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1988 Oct; 35(10):817-27. PubMed ID: 3192231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cascaded systems analysis in conventional X-ray CT: a new, objective approach.
    Schegerer AA; Schlattl H; Dietz W; Renger B; Brunner C; Rummeny EJ; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):439-42. PubMed ID: 20233757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [An analysis of 3-dimensional images in radiodiagnosis].
    Kossovoĭ AL
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1990 Nov; 35(11):41-4. PubMed ID: 2259283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scenes from the past: high-resolution spiral CT of Egyptian scarabs.
    Jansen RJ; Poulus M; Venema H; Stoker J
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 11796899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT dose: medical residents take note.
    Slothus RJ
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 82(2):112. PubMed ID: 21048061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of image recording distances for quantitative X-ray in-line phase contrast imaging.
    Ren Y; Chen C; Chen R; Zhou G; Wang Y; Xiao T
    Opt Express; 2011 Feb; 19(5):4170-81. PubMed ID: 21369246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Enhanced digitally reconstructed radiographs generated by ray tracing].
    Wang J; Wu Z; Zhang C; Hou Q
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 22(1):125-8, 142. PubMed ID: 15762132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reconstruction of a ring applicator using CT imaging: impact of the reconstruction method and applicator orientation.
    Hellebust TP; Tanderup K; Bergstrand ES; Knutsen BH; Røislien J; Olsen DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4893-904. PubMed ID: 17671342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compensation of some time dependent deformations in tomography.
    Desbat L; Roux S; Grangeat P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Feb; 26(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 17304739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system.
    Morin RL; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17411815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partial-data interpolation method for arc handling in a computed tomography scanner.
    Rajwade J; Miller L; Simon D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2012 Jul; 36(5):387-95. PubMed ID: 22564546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.