118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38424667)
1. Smartphone-Facilitated In-Situ Hearing Aid Audiometry for Community-Based Hearing Testing.
Frisby C; De Sousa KC; Eikelboom RH; Mahomed-Asmail F; Moore DR; de Kock T; Manchaiah V; Swanepoel W
Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 38424667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monitoring Hearing in an Infectious Disease Clinic with mHealth Technologies.
Brittz M; Heinze B; Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel W; Stoltz A
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):482-492. PubMed ID: 30461403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting reliability and validity of self-directed automatic in situ audiometry: implications for self-fitting hearing AIDS.
Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Yeend I; Freeston K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 25597456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
Kiessling J; Leifholz M; Unkel S; Pons-Kühnemann J; Jespersen CT; Pedersen JN
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 25597462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Multicenter Validity Study of Four Smartphone Hearing Test Apps in Optimized and Home Environments.
Swords C; Twumasi E; Fitzgerald M; Fitzsimons-West E; Luo M; Dunne H; Lim KH; Jones O; Law S; Myuran T; Smith G; Tailor BV; Wakelam O; de Cates C; Borsetto D; Tysome J; Donnelly N; Axon P; Bance M; Smith ME
Laryngoscope; 2024 Jun; 134(6):2864-2870. PubMed ID: 38214403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the accuracy and reliability of application-based audiometry for hearing evaluation.
Lee SY; Seo HW; Jung SM; Lee SH; Chung JH
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):7359. PubMed ID: 38548854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and Reliability of Smartphone Self-Test Audiometry in Community Clinics in Low Income Settings: A Comparative Study.
Sandström J; Swanepoel D; Laurent C; Umefjord G; Lundberg T
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Jun; 129(6):578-584. PubMed ID: 31965808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pure-tone audiometry outside a sound booth using earphone attentuation, integrated noise monitoring, and automation.
Swanepoel de W; Matthysen C; Eikelboom RH; Clark JL; Hall JW
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):777-85. PubMed ID: 26514954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-situ Audiometry Compared to Conventional Audiometry for Hearing Aid Fitting.
Van Eeckhoutte M; Jasper BS; Kjærbøl EF; Jordell DH; Dau T
Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241259704. PubMed ID: 38835268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of the Home Hearing Test: Implications for Public Health.
Mosley CL; Langley LM; Davis A; McMahon CM; Tremblay KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30461396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts.
Sandström J; Swanepoel de W; Carel Myburgh H; Laurent C
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 26795898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Home-Based Audiometry With a Smartphone App: Reliable Results?
Hazan A; Luberadzka J; Rivilla J; Snik A; Albers B; Méndez N; Wack N; Paytuvi O; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Kinsbergen J
Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 31(3S):914-922. PubMed ID: 35926189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry.
Margolis RH; Saly GL; Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 35817024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobile audiometry for hearing threshold assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Oremule B; Abbas J; Saunders G; Kluk K; Isba R; Bate S; Bruce I
Clin Otolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 49(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 37828806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
