These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38424858)

  • 21. Architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis mammograms in symptomatic breast clinics: what are the result outcomes?
    Bansal GJ; Kale R
    Br J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 97(1159):1328-1334. PubMed ID: 38745365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Added Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Combined with Digital Mammography According to Reader Agreement: Changes in BI-RADS Rate and Follow-Up Management.
    Galati F; Marzocca F; Bassetti E; Luciani ML; Tan S; Catalano C; Pediconi F
    Breast Care (Basel); 2017 Sep; 12(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 29070984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Dibble EH; Singer TM; Jimoh N; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 31553658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management.
    Pujara AC; Hui J; Wang LC
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():133-137. PubMed ID: 30639524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The added value of digital breast tomosynthesis in improving diagnostic performance of BI-RADS categorization of mammographically indeterminate breast lesions.
    Basha MAA; Safwat HK; Alaa Eldin AM; Dawoud HA; Hassanin AM
    Insights Imaging; 2020 Feb; 11(1):26. PubMed ID: 32060736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Utility of Breast MRI for Further Evaluation of Equivocal Findings on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Niell BL; Bhatt K; Dang P; Humphrey K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 30207789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Impact of Adding Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to BI-RADS Categorization of Mammographically Equivocal Breast Lesions.
    Hassan RM; Almalki YE; Basha MAA; Alduraibi SK; Aboualkheir M; Almushayti ZA; Aldhilan AS; Aly SA; Alshamy AA
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Apr; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37189524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Weinstein SP; Schnall MD; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2017 Dec; 285(3):778-787. PubMed ID: 28715278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Outcomes for One-View Asymmetries Recalled From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening Examinations.
    Gong AJ; Nguyen DL; Lee EE; Mullen LA; Myers KS; Oluyemi E; Ambinder EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):724-733. PubMed ID: 35703412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammographic Screening in Routine Practice: Multisite Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screenings.
    Conant EF; Talley MM; Parghi CR; Sheh BC; Liang SY; Pohlman S; Rane A; Jung Y; Stevens LAS; Paulus JK; Alsheik N
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(3):e221571. PubMed ID: 36916891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) Helps to Safely Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies for Low to Moderately Suspicious Soft Tissue Lesions.
    Zuley ML; Bandos AI; Abrams GS; Ganott MA; Gizienski TA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Nair BE; Sumkin JH; Waheed U; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):969-976. PubMed ID: 31495761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time.
    Raghu M; Durand MA; Andrejeva L; Goehler A; Michalski MH; Geisel JL; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Butler R; Forman HP; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 27139264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies.
    Nguyen DL; Boron A; Oluyemi ET; Myers KS; Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):212-223. PubMed ID: 36102725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Benefit of digital breast tomosynthesis in symptomatic young women (≤30 years) diagnosed with BI-RADS category 4 or 5 on ultrasound.
    Huang JL; Lin Q
    Clin Radiol; 2022 Jan; 77(1):e55-e63. PubMed ID: 34763818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Our experience using synthesized mammography vs full field digital mammography in population-based screening.
    Ahmadinejad N; Rasoulighasemlouei S; Rostamzadeh N; Arian A; Mohajeri A; Miratashi Yazdi SN
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2023; 10():100475. PubMed ID: 36647512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.
    Kuhl CK; Keulers A; Strobel K; Schneider H; Gaisa N; Schrading S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 29426360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tomosynthesis-Detected Architectural Distortions: Correlations between Imaging Characteristics and Histopathologic Outcomes.
    Romanucci G; Fornasa F; Caneva A; Rossati C; Mandarà M; Tommasini O; Rella R
    J Imaging; 2023 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37233322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.