BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38424884)

  • 1. Telemammography: Technical Advances Improve Patient Access in Breast Care.
    Chung HL; Parikh JR
    J Breast Imaging; 2020 Mar; 2(2):152-156. PubMed ID: 38424884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Telemammography: implementation issues.
    Goldberg MA; Dwyer SJ
    Telemed J; 1995; 1(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 10165158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multisite telemammography system for remote management of screening mammography: an assessment of technical, operational, and clinical issues.
    Leader JK; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Wallace LP; Clearfield RJ; Perrin RL; Drescher JM; Maitz GS; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 16710798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications.
    Lou SL; Lin HD; Lin KP; Hoogstrate D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2000; 24(4):205-20. PubMed ID: 10842045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Full-field direct digital telemammography: technical components, study protocols, and preliminary results.
    Lou SL; Sickles EA; Huang HK; Hoogstrate D; Cao F; Wang J; Jahangiri M
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 1997 Dec; 1(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 11020830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digitized mammograms: a preliminary clinical evaluation and the potential for telemammography.
    Murphy JM; O'Hare NJ; Wheat D; McCarthy PA; Dowling A; Hayes R; Bowmer H; Wilson GF; Molloy MP
    J Telemed Telecare; 1999; 5(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 10628036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary clinical evaluation of a high-resolution telemammography system.
    Maitz GS; Chang TS; Sumkin JH; Wintz PW; Johns CM; Ganott M; Holbert BL; Hakim CM; Harris KM; Gur D; Herron JM
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 9101359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Teleradiology/telepathology requirements and implementation.
    Mun SK; Elsayed AM; Tohme WG; Wu YC
    J Med Syst; 1995 Apr; 19(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 7602247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of the BI-RADS Final Assessment Categories and Management Recommendations in a Telemammography Context.
    Salazar AJ; Romero JA; Bernal OA; Moreno AP; Velasco SC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 May; 14(5):686-692.e2. PubMed ID: 27815054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding linkage to biopsy and treatment for breast cancer after a high-risk telemammography result in Peru: a mixed-methods study.
    Errea RA; Garcia PJ; Pace LE; Galea JT; Franke MF
    BMJ Open; 2022 Apr; 12(4):e050457. PubMed ID: 35487706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Telemammography for breast cancer screening: a cost-effective approach in Argentina.
    Malek Pascha VA; Sun L; Gilardino R; Legood R
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2021 Jul; 28(1):. PubMed ID: 34281995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer aided diagnosis for breast masses detection on a telemammography system.
    Méndez AJ; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Vidal JJ
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2003; 27(6):497-502. PubMed ID: 14575784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "From the technology came the idea": safe implementation and operation of a high quality teleradiology model increasing access to timely breast cancer assessment services for women in rural Australia.
    Johnston K; Smith D; Preston R; Evans R; Carlisle K; Lengren J; Naess H; Phillips E; Shephard G; Lydiard L; Lattimore D; Larkins S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1103. PubMed ID: 33256724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of low-cost telemammography screening configurations: a comparison with film-screen readings in vulnerable areas.
    Salazar AJ; Romero J; Bernal O; Moreno A; Velasco S; Díaz X
    J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 24802372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Authenticity and integrity of digital mammography images.
    Zhou XQ; Huang HK; Lou SL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):784-91. PubMed ID: 11513029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Missed breast carcinoma; why and how to avoid?
    Kamal RM; Abdel Razek NM; Hassan MA; Shaalan MA
    J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2007 Sep; 19(3):178-94. PubMed ID: 19190691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.