108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38424918)
1. Personalized Screening in the Age of Acceleration.
Morris EA; D'Alessio D
J Breast Imaging; 2019 Jun; 1(2):107-108. PubMed ID: 38424918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.
Cenin DR; Naber SK; de Weerdt AC; Jenkins MA; Preen DB; Ee HC; O'Leary PC; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2020 Jan; 29(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 31748260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "For and against" factors influencing participation in personalized breast cancer screening programs: a qualitative systematic review until March 2022.
Laza C; Niño de Guzmán E; Gea M; Plazas M; Posso M; Rué M; Castells X; Román M
Arch Public Health; 2024 Feb; 82(1):23. PubMed ID: 38389068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personalized risk prediction for breast cancer pre-screening using artificial intelligence and thermal radiomics.
Kakileti ST; Madhu HJ; Manjunath G; Wee L; Dekker A; Sampangi S
Artif Intell Med; 2020 May; 105():101854. PubMed ID: 32505418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Personalized driving safety: Using telematics to reduce risky driving behaviour among young drivers.
Meuleners L; Fraser M; Stevenson M; Roberts P
J Safety Res; 2023 Sep; 86():164-173. PubMed ID: 37718043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Wearable Flexible Acceleration Sensor for Monitoring Human Motion.
He Z; Wang K; Zhao Z; Zhang T; Li Y; Wang L
Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36005016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the Acceleration Limits of Deep Learning Variational Network-based Two-dimensional Brain MRI.
Radmanesh A; Muckley MJ; Murrell T; Lindsey E; Sriram A; Knoll F; Sodickson DK; Lui YW
Radiol Artif Intell; 2022 Nov; 4(6):e210313. PubMed ID: 36523647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the personalized invitation of Czech citizens to screening programs.
Ngo O; Chloupková R; Ambrožová M; Suchánek Š; Zavoral M; Seifert B; Dvořák V; Daneš J; Skovajsová M; Dušek L; Májek O
Cas Lek Cesk; 2019; 158(3-4):147-150. PubMed ID: 31416323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT).
Breekveldt ECH; Toes-Zoutendijk E; de Jonge L; Spaander MCW; Dekker E; van Kemenade FJ; van Vuuren AJ; Ramakers CRB; Nagtegaal ID; van Leerdam ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
BMC Gastroenterol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):45. PubMed ID: 36814185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Personalized, Teleretinal-Inclusive Screening Policy for Diabetic Retinopathy via Markov Modeling.
Dorali P; Shahmoradi Z; Weng CY; Lee T
Ophthalmol Retina; 2023 Jun; 7(6):532-542. PubMed ID: 36621610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene‒Prostate-Specific-Antigen-Guided Personalized Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Yang TK; Chuang PC; Yen AM; Chen HH; Chen SL
Genes (Basel); 2019 Aug; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 31450602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of personalized colorectal cancer risk information on laypersons' interest in colorectal cancer screening: The importance of individual differences.
Han PK; Duarte CW; Daggett S; Siewers A; Killam B; Smith KA; Freedman AN
Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Oct; 98(10):1280-6. PubMed ID: 26227576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gender-Related Differences in Mechanics of the Sprint Start and Sprint Acceleration of Top National-Level Sprinters.
Mirkov DM; Knezevic OM; Garcia-Ramos A; Čoh M; Šarabon N
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32899837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-Series-Based Personalized Lane-Changing Decision-Making Model.
Ye M; Pu L; Li P; Lu X; Liu Y
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36081119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Evolutionary Algorithm to Personalize Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening.
van Duuren LA; Ozik J; Spliet R; Collier NT; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Meester RGS
Front Physiol; 2021; 12():718276. PubMed ID: 35153804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Personalized Mammography Screening and Screening Adherence-A Simulation and Economic Evaluation.
Arnold M; Quante AS
Value Health; 2018 Jul; 21(7):799-808. PubMed ID: 30005752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of pregnancy on female gait characteristics: a pilot study based on portable gait analyzer and induced acceleration analysis.
Li X; Lu Z; Cen X; Zhou Y; Xuan R; Sun D; Gu Y
Front Physiol; 2023; 14():1034132. PubMed ID: 37260595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Superiority of acceleration and acceleration time over pulsatility and resistance indices as screening tests for renal artery stenosis.
Burdick L; Airoldi F; Marana I; Giussani M; Alberti C; Cianci M; Lovaria A; Saccheri S; Gazzano G; Morganti A
J Hypertens; 1996 Oct; 14(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 8906523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Personalized Risk-Based Screening Design for Comparative Two-Arm Group Sequential Clinical Trials.
Park Y
J Pers Med; 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35330448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The potential of head acceleration measurement to augment current best practice in concussion screening in professional Australian football players.
Reyes J; Willmott C; McIntosh A; Howard TS; Clifton P; Makdissi M; Harcourt P; Cameron P; Rosenfeld JV; Nguyen JVK; Mitra B
Phys Ther Sport; 2020 May; 43():210-216. PubMed ID: 32248080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
