127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38425140)
1. Comparison of outcomes of laparotomic and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.
Chang SH; Huang KG; Yang LY; Pan YB; Lai CH; Chou HH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38425140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Luo C; Liu M; Li X
BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
Chen C; Guo J; Liu P; Li Z; Jiang H; Zhu Q; Bin X; Lang J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1516-1526. PubMed ID: 33527615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of modified no-touch laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on outcomes of early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
He F; Yuan S; Chen X; Zhang S; Han Y; Lin T; Xu B; Huang S; Pan Z
Cancer Med; 2022 Jun; 11(11):2224-2232. PubMed ID: 35156771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy vs. Robotic assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Taher Masoud A; Abdelsattar A; King A; Brazil G; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Baruelo G; Govindan M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():190-202. PubMed ID: 37690282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of robotic
Chen L; Liu LP; Wen N; Qiao X; Meng YG
World J Clin Cases; 2019 Oct; 7(20):3185-3193. PubMed ID: 31667168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Wang W; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1331. PubMed ID: 31828044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 207(3):195.e1-8. PubMed ID: 22939724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effects of colpotomic approaches on prognosis and recurrence sites of stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy].
Zhou D; Li YD; Ling KJ; Wang RW; Wang YZ; Tang S; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 58(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 36720615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in FIGO 2018 early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma: Long-term survival outcomes after propensity score matching.
Yin Z; Cui Z; Kang S; Ji M; Li D; Chen B; Zhan X; Li W; Liu P; Chen C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Dec; 49(12):2849-2859. PubMed ID: 37658744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
