These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38425991)

  • 1. Joint Modelling of Latent Cognitive Mechanisms Shared Across Decision-Making Domains.
    Stevenson N; Innes RJ; Boag RJ; Miletić S; Isherwood SJS; Trutti AC; Heathcote A; Forstmann BU
    Comput Brain Behav; 2024; 7(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 38425991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Think fast! The implications of emphasizing urgency in decision-making.
    Evans NJ
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104704. PubMed ID: 33975126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new model of decision processing in instrumental learning tasks.
    Miletić S; Boag RJ; Trutti AC; Stevenson N; Forstmann BU; Heathcote A
    Elife; 2021 Jan; 10():. PubMed ID: 33501916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence accumulation modelling in the wild: understanding safety-critical decisions.
    Boag RJ; Strickland L; Heathcote A; Neal A; Palada H; Loft S
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2023 Feb; 27(2):175-188. PubMed ID: 36473764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Double responding: A new constraint for models of speeded decision making.
    Evans NJ; Dutilh G; Wagenmakers EJ; van der Maas HLJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Sep; 121():101292. PubMed ID: 32217348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.
    Hickie IB; Scott EM; Cross SP; Iorfino F; Davenport TA; Guastella AJ; Naismith SL; Carpenter JS; Rohleder C; Crouse JJ; Hermens DF; Koethe D; Markus Leweke F; Tickell AM; Sawrikar V; Scott J
    Med J Aust; 2019 Nov; 211 Suppl 9():S3-S46. PubMed ID: 31679171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing the factor structure underlying behavior using joint cognitive models: Impulsivity in delay discounting and Cambridge gambling tasks.
    Kvam PD; Romeu RJ; Turner BM; Vassileva J; Busemeyer JR
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):18-37. PubMed ID: 32134313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-Specific Neural Representations of Generalizable Metacognitive Control Signals in the Human Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex.
    Su J; Jia W; Wan X
    J Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 42(7):1275-1291. PubMed ID: 34907025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Designing a mHealth clinical decision support system for Parkinson's disease: a theoretically grounded user needs approach.
    Timotijevic L; Hodgkins CE; Banks A; Rusconi P; Egan B; Peacock M; Seiss E; Touray MML; Gage H; Pellicano C; Spalletta G; Assogna F; Giglio M; Marcante A; Gentile G; Cikajlo I; Gatsios D; Konitsiotis S; Fotiadis D
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Feb; 20(1):34. PubMed ID: 32075633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PyBEAM: A Bayesian approach to parameter inference for a wide class of binary evidence accumulation models.
    Murrow M; Holmes WR
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2636-2656. PubMed ID: 37550470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EEG-based Identification of Evidence Accumulation Stages in Decision-Making.
    Berberyan HS; van Maanen L; van Rijn H; Borst J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 33(3):510-527. PubMed ID: 33326329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using behavioral theory and shared decision-making to understand clinical trial recruitment: interviews with trial recruiters.
    Brehaut JC; Lavin Venegas C; Hudek N; Presseau J; Carroll K; Rodger M
    Trials; 2021 Apr; 22(1):298. PubMed ID: 33883012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal policy for uncertainty estimation concurrent with decision making.
    Li X; Su R; Chen Y; Yang T
    Cell Rep; 2023 Mar; 42(3):112232. PubMed ID: 36924497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Joint Modelling Approach to Analyze Risky Decisions by Means of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Behavioural Data.
    D'Alessandro M; Gallitto G; Greco A; Lombardi L
    Brain Sci; 2020 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 32121566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Error monitoring in decision-making and timing is disrupted in autism spectrum disorder.
    Doenyas C; Mutluer T; Genç E; Balcı F
    Autism Res; 2019 Feb; 12(2):239-248. PubMed ID: 30485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Ballesteros J; Moral E; Brieva L; Ruiz-Beato E; Prefasi D; Maurino J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28431587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience.
    Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2001; 28():41-100. PubMed ID: 11605365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference.
    Dohmen T; Falk A; Huffman D; Sunde U
    J Econ Perspect; 2018; 32(2):115-34. PubMed ID: 30203932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The neural implausibility of the diffusion decision model doesn't matter for cognitive psychometrics, but the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model is better.
    Wang JS; Donkin C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38743214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.