These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3842628)

  • 1. Comparison of low-osmolar contrast media in cardiac angiography.
    Peck RJ; Bull MJ; Cumberland DC
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Dec; 58(696):1177-8. PubMed ID: 3842628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the side-effects of low-osmolar contrast media in intravenous urography.
    Foord KD; Kaye B; Howard J; Cumberland DC
    Clin Radiol; 1985 Jul; 36(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 4064528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the image quality of intravenous urograms using low-osmolar contrast media.
    Kaye B; Howard J; Foord KD; Cumberland DC
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):589-91. PubMed ID: 3408846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of low osmolar contrast agents during coronary angiography in the dog and the rabbit.
    Doucet D; Idée JM; Donadieu AM; Bonnemain B
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2742326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of low-osmolar contrast media in paediatric cardiac angiography.
    Rubin CM; Ogilvie BC; Keeton BR
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Feb; 60(710):133-5. PubMed ID: 3815009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
    Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of low osmolality water soluble (LOWS) contrast media in the pediatric gastro-intestinal tract. A report of 115 examinations.
    Ratcliffe JF
    Pediatr Radiol; 1986; 16(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3945499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemodynamic abnormalities during coronary angiography: comparison of Hypaque-76, Hexabrix, and Omnipaque-350.
    Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Hwang MH; Raymond RM; Scanlon PJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1989 Mar; 16(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 2920387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of low osmolar contrast media on cardiac function: optimal sodium concentration for contractility.
    Oksendal AN; Holten T; Bååth L; Jynge P
    Acta Physiol Scand Suppl; 1991; 599():149-56. PubMed ID: 1867105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between a low-osmolar ionic (ioxaglate) and a low-osmolar non-ionic (iopamidol) contrast agent in cardiac imaging.
    Scholtz ME; Svatos VJ; Myburgh DP
    S Afr Med J; 1988 Feb; 73(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 3340942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Hexabrix 320 and Hexabrix 250 in aortoperipheral arteriography: towards cheaper low osmolar contrast media?
    Joyce PF; O'Neill M; Kweka E; Bajwa QM
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1989; 12(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 2507152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Low osmolality contrast media in peripheral arteriography--clinical comparison of ioxaglate, iopamidol, iohexol and diatrizoate].
    Tajima H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Nov; 45(11):1407-20. PubMed ID: 4094879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low dose low osmolar intravenous urography.
    Eyes BE; Goldman M; Nixon TE; Scally J; Brown A
    Clin Radiol; 1987 Jul; 38(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 3304790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three new low-osmolality contrast agents: a comparative study of patient discomfort.
    Smith DC; Yahiku PY; Maloney MD; Hart KL
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1988; 9(1):137-9. PubMed ID: 3124566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of iohexol and ioxaglate in selective coronary angiography.
    Haagen FD; Lok D; Pasteuning H
    Can J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 3 Suppl A():16A-20A. PubMed ID: 3435850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low dose urography. A clinical comparison of three low osmolar (ratio 3) contrast media.
    Björk L; Zachrisson BF
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(5):557-9. PubMed ID: 3799228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast media-induced ventricular fibrillation. A comparison of Hypaque-76, Hexabrix, and Omnipaque.
    Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Hwang MH; Raymond RM; Scanlon PJ
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Jun; 23(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 3403207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variable effects of radiological contrast media on thrombus growth in a rabbit jugular vein thrombosis model.
    Levi M; Biemond BJ; Sturk A; Hoek J; ten Cate JW
    Thromb Haemost; 1991 Aug; 66(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 1771615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ionic and nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in coronary arteriography. A crossover study in children.
    Saito H; Kimura K; Takamiya M; Yamamoto K; Ohta M; Yamagami H; Kamiya T
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Dec; 23(12):910-3. PubMed ID: 3203992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safe ex vivo coronary angiography with isosmotic contrast agent.
    Schmit DB; Kern JA; Mauney MC; Kron IL; Tribble CG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Aug; 112(2):306-9. PubMed ID: 8751495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.