These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3842637)

  • 41. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
    Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Digital image intensifier radiography: a new concept for traumatologic x-ray diagnosis?].
    Schmidt C; Deininger HK
    Rofo; 1990 Jan; 152(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 2154009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Radiation dose reduction in panoramic radiography. Orthopantomograph Model OP 3 modified for rare earth intensifying screens.
    Forsgren L; Julin P
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):225-31. PubMed ID: 6963005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Speed S sensitivity of film-screen systems and mode of action of different automatic illumination in general practice. I: Film-screen systems].
    Blendl C; Kondmann M; Müller J
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 9410006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [The Rentgen-40 roentgen diagnostic apparatus].
    Sosnin FR; Ivanov IuG; Khaĭrulin AA; Chuliukov GM; Shvartsman AS
    Med Tekh; 1988; (3):13-7. PubMed ID: 3419306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Experimental studies of film density using a roentgen exposure system with special reference to the effect of scattered radiation].
    Klein J; Blobel J
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1983; 24(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 6611910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Exposure reduction and image quality in orthodontic radiology: a review of the literature.
    Taylor TS; Ackerman RJ; Hardman PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Jan; 93(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 3276147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Optimization of dynamic fuzziness and enhancement of image quality of an URI/230-Amethyst digital image intensifier].
    Blinov AB; Kozlovskiĭ EB; Luzin SI; Plutov IG; Rodin VI
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):6-8. PubMed ID: 12512273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Sensitivity figures for film-screen combinations for medical diagnosis].
    He G; Hoeschen D; Mirandé W
    Rofo; 1982 Dec; 137(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 6218053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The energy-dependent behavior of noise Wiener spectra in their low-frequency limits: comparison with simple theory.
    Vyborny CJ; Loo LN; Doi K
    Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):619-22. PubMed ID: 7100480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Documentation and constancy evaluation of medical roentgen units. Direct radiography with digital image recording systems].
    Huber S
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(7):238-43. PubMed ID: 10605326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Scatter fraction and image contrast.
    Venema HW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):835-6. PubMed ID: 10063895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The image intensifier in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
    Gans BJ; Kallal RH; Helgerson AC; Verona SR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1982 Nov; 40(11):726-9. PubMed ID: 6957560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Point/Counterpoint. A major advantage of digital imaging for general radiography is the potential for reduced patient dose so film/screen systems should be phased out as unnecessarily hazardous.
    Vano E; Faulkner K; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1529-31. PubMed ID: 16872058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessment of the current use of rare-earth screens in the United Kingdom.
    Russell JG
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Jun; 59(702):630. PubMed ID: 3708274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Green-sensitive X-ray systems and specific features of working with them].
    Blinov NN; Gorelik FG; Reznik KA
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):13-5. PubMed ID: 12512275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography].
    Fasbender R; Schaetzing R
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 12764585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of radiation exposures between conventional and rare-earth screen/film systems.
    Chu WK; Sangster W; Dobry CA
    Health Phys; 1985 Nov; 49(5):958-61. PubMed ID: 4066354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.