These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38426432)

  • 1. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement in Obese Patients: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Cammertoni F; Bruno P; Pavone N; Nesta M; Chiariello GA; Grandinetti M; D'Avino S; Sanesi V; D'Errico D; Massetti M
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Mar; 39(2):e20230159. PubMed ID: 38426432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved Patient Recovery With Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Bruno P; Cammertoni F; Rosenhek R; Mazza A; Pavone N; Iafrancesco M; Nesta M; Chiariello GA; Spalletta C; Graziano G; Sanesi V; D'Errico D; Massetti M
    Innovations (Phila); 2019 Oct; 14(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 31431105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery in Octogenarians: Reliable Option or Fallback Solution?
    Cammertoni F; Bruno P; Rosenhek R; Pavone N; Farina P; Mazza A; Iafrancesco M; Nesta M; Chiariello GA; Comerci G; Pasquini A; Cavaliere F; Guarneri S; Marzetti E; Rabini A; Piarulli A; Sanesi V; D'Errico D; Massetti M
    Innovations (Phila); 2021; 16(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 33320024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass set-up and management on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.
    Cammertoni F; Bruno P; Pavone N; Farina P; Mazza A; Iafrancesco M; Nesta M; Chiariello GA; Spalletta C; Cavaliere F; Calabrese M; D'Angelo GA; Sanesi V; Conti F; D'Errico D; Massetti M
    Perfusion; 2021 Oct; 36(7):679-687. PubMed ID: 34080484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right mini-thoracotomy for hemodialysis patients.
    Ito Y; Nakamura Y; Yasumoto Y; Yoshiyama D; Kuroda M; Nishijima S; Nakayama T; Tsuruta R; Narita T
    Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 May; 70(5):439-444. PubMed ID: 34676484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
    Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study From the UK National Data.
    Attia RQ; Hickey GL; Grant SW; Bridgewater B; Roxburgh JC; Kumar P; Ridley P; Bhabra M; Millner RW; Athanasiou T; Casula R; Chukwuemka A; Pillay T; Young CP
    Innovations (Phila); 2016; 11(1):15-23; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 26926521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive and full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement: a comparative early operative outcomes.
    Zallé I; Son M; El-Alaoui M; Nijimbéré M; Boumzebra D
    Pan Afr Med J; 2021; 40():68. PubMed ID: 34804336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional isolated aortic valve replacement.
    Oo S; Khan A; Chan J; Juneja S; Caputo M; Angelini G; Rajakaruna C; Vohra HA
    Perfusion; 2023 Mar; 38(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 34515578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
    Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Traditional Sternotomy Versus Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Stratified by Ejection Fraction.
    Nguyen TC; Thourani VH; Pham JQ; Zhao Y; Terwelp MD; Balan P; Ocazionez D; Loghin C; Smalling RW; Estrera AL; Lamelas J
    Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 28099179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of Pleural Integrity Preservation After Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery.
    Bacchi B; Cabrucci F; Chiarello B; Dokollari A; Bonacchi M
    Innovations (Phila); 2024; 19(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 39066657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Right Anterior Thoracotomy vs. Median Full Sternotomy in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Analysis.
    Abubokha AOK; Li R; Li CH; Zalloom AM; Wei X
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Apr; 39(3):e20230108. PubMed ID: 38569069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a 10-year experience.
    Korach A; Shemin RJ; Hunter CT; Bao Y; Shapira OM
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2010 Jun; 51(3):417-21. PubMed ID: 20523293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients.
    Bowdish ME; Hui DS; Cleveland JD; Mack WJ; Sinha R; Ranjan R; Cohen RG; Baker CJ; Cunningham MJ; Barr ML; Starnes VA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 25750007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.
    Almeida AS; Ceron RO; Anschau F; de Oliveira JB; Leão Neto TC; Rode J; Rey RAW; Lira KB; Delvaux RS; de Souza RORR
    Innovations (Phila); 2022; 17(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 35044253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients.
    Welp HA; Herlemann I; Martens S; Deschka H
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 29617839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propensity score analysis of a six-year experience with minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement.
    Sharony R; Grossi EA; Saunders PC; Schwartz CF; Ribakove GH; Baumann FG; Galloway AC; Colvin SB
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 15597578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid-Deployment Versus Conventional Bio-Prosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Smith AL; Shi WY; Rosalion A; Yii M; O'Keefe M; Newcomb AE; Davis P
    Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Feb; 26(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 27523460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.