These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38427630)

  • 1. Knowing me, knowing you-A study on top-down requirements for compensatory scanning in drivers with homonymous visual field loss.
    Biebl B; Kuhn M; Stolle F; Xu J; Bengler K; Bowers AR
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0299129. PubMed ID: 38427630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Visual Field Loss from Stroke on Performance in a Driving Simulator.
    Bro T; Andersson J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Sep; 99(9):679-686. PubMed ID: 35914086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Change blindness in simulated driving in individuals with homonymous visual field loss.
    Swan G; Xu J; Baliutaviciute V; Bowers A
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 May; 7(1):44. PubMed ID: 35569089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of driver compensatory behaviour on risks of critical pedestrian collisions under simulated visual field defects.
    Lee J; Itoh M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231130. PubMed ID: 32271822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driving with binocular visual field loss? A study on a supervised on-road parcours with simultaneous eye and head tracking.
    Kasneci E; Sippel K; Aehling K; Heister M; Rosenstiel W; Schiefer U; Papageorgiou E
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87470. PubMed ID: 24523869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Opportunities and Limitations of a Gaze-Contingent Display to Simulate Visual Field Loss in Driving Simulator Studies.
    Biebl B; Arcidiacono E; Kacianka S; Rieger JW; Bengler K
    Front Neuroergon; 2022; 3():916169. PubMed ID: 38235462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator.
    Bowers AR; Ananyev E; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1540-8. PubMed ID: 24474265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driving with hemianopia VIII: Effects of a vibro-tactile assistance system on safety and gaze behavior in pedestrian crossing situations.
    Hölzl R; Steckhan L; Lehsing C; Savage SW; Bowers AR
    Safety (Basel); 2021 Mar; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 34765674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.
    Bronstad PM; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 23329309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Driving and exceptional cases: Supporting relicensing evaluation in patients whose visual fields fail to meet standards.
    Harper RA; Parkes JA; Dickinson CM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Sep; 42(5):1009-1014. PubMed ID: 35687309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting practical fitness to drive in drivers with visual field defects caused by ocular pathology.
    Coeckelbergh TR; Brouwer WH; Cornelissen FW; Kooijman AC
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):748-60. PubMed ID: 15709335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of superior and inferior visual field loss on hazard detection in a computer-based driving test.
    Glen FC; Smith ND; Crabb DP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 99(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25425712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hazard Detection by Drivers with Paracentral Homonymous Field Loss: A Small Case Series.
    Matthew BP; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein RB; Peli E
    J Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Dec; 2011(Suppl 5):1. PubMed ID: 24501685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual attention outperforms visual-perceptual parameters required by law as an indicator of on-road driving performance.
    Grundler W; Strasburger H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236147. PubMed ID: 32797082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elderly drivers and simulated visual impairment.
    Wood JM; Troutbeck R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Feb; 72(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 7753525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual attention and self-regulation of driving among older adults.
    Okonkwo OC; Crowe M; Wadley VG; Ball K
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2008 Feb; 20(1):162-73. PubMed ID: 17697393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agreement of driving simulator and on-road driving performance in patients with binocular visual field loss.
    Ungewiss J; Kübler T; Sippel K; Aehling K; Heister M; Rosenstiel W; Kasneci E; Papageorgiou E;
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 256(12):2429-2435. PubMed ID: 30251198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collision avoidance in persons with homonymous visual field defects under virtual reality conditions.
    Papageorgiou E; Hardiess G; Ackermann H; Wiethoelter H; Dietz K; Mallot HA; Schiefer U
    Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 52(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 22100816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of visual field loss from glaucoma on performance in a driving simulator.
    Bro T; Andersson J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 100(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 33529454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of cyclists present at rural intersections on speed behavior and workload of car drivers: a driving simulator study.
    Duivenvoorden K; Hogema J; Hagenzieker M; Wegman F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():254-9. PubMed ID: 25000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.