These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38428125)

  • 1. Subcutaneous preservation versus cryopreservation of autologous bone grafts for cranioplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Al-Salihi MM; Ayyad A; Al-Jebur MS; Al-Salihi Y; Hammadi F; Bowman K; Baskaya MK
    J Clin Neurosci; 2024 Apr; 122():1-9. PubMed ID: 38428125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cryopreservation of Autologous Cranial Bone Flaps for Cranioplasty: A Large Sample Retrospective Study.
    Fan MC; Wang QL; Sun P; Zhan SH; Guo P; Deng WS; Dong Q
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jan; 109():e853-e859. PubMed ID: 29107719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cryopreservation versus subcutaneous preservation of autologous bone flaps for cranioplasty: comparison of the surgical site infection and bone resorption rates.
    Cheng CH; Lee HC; Chen CC; Cho DY; Lin HL
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Sep; 124():85-9. PubMed ID: 25019457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
    Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does difference in the storage method of bone flaps after decompressive craniectomy affect the incidence of surgical site infection after cranioplasty? Comparison between subcutaneous pocket and cryopreservation.
    Inamasu J; Kuramae T; Nakatsukasa M
    J Trauma; 2010 Jan; 68(1):183-7; discussion 187. PubMed ID: 20065773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of subcutaneous pocket with cryopreservation method for storing autologous bone flaps in developing surgical wound infection after Cranioplasty: A randomized clinical trial.
    Shafiei M; Sourani A; Saboori M; Aminmansour B; Mahram S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 91():136-143. PubMed ID: 34373019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the Factors Affecting Surgical Site Infection and Bone Flap Resorption after Cranioplasty with Autologous Cryopreserved Bone: The Importance of Temporalis Muscle Preservation.
    Jin SW; Kim SD; Ha SK; Lim DJ; Lee H; You HJ
    Turk Neurosurg; 2018; 28(6):882-888. PubMed ID: 29165749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subcutaneous bone flap storage after emergency craniectomy: cost-effectiveness and rate of resorption.
    Ernst G; Qeadan F; Carlson AP
    J Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 129(6):1604-1610. PubMed ID: 29303450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autologous Bone Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Frozen and Subcutaneous Bone Flap Storage Methods.
    Rosinski CL; Chaker AN; Zakrzewski J; Geever B; Patel S; Chiu RG; Rosenberg DM; Parola R; Shah K; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 131():e312-e320. PubMed ID: 31351936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cranioplasty with autologous cryopreserved bone after decompressive craniectomy: complications and risk factors for developing surgical site infection.
    Sundseth J; Sundseth A; Berg-Johnsen J; Sorteberg W; Lindegaard KF
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Apr; 156(4):805-11; discussion 811. PubMed ID: 24493001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term follow-up of cryopreservation with glycerol of autologous bone flaps for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
    Takeuchi H; Higashino Y; Hosoda T; Yamada S; Arishima H; Kodera T; Kitai R; Kikuta K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Mar; 158(3):571-5. PubMed ID: 26733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of Surgical Site Infection in Autologous Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Subcutaneously Preserved Bone Flaps in Abdominal Pockets.
    Alkhaibary A; Alharbi A; Abbas M; Algarni A; Abdullah JM; Almadani WH; Khairy I; Alkhani A; Aloraidi A; Khairy S
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e627-e632. PubMed ID: 31568916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decompressive hemicraniectomy and cranioplasty using subcutaneously preserved autologous bone flaps versus synthetic implants: perioperative outcomes and cost analysis.
    Dowlati E; Pasko KBD; Molina EA; Felbaum DR; Mason RB; Mai JC; Nair MN; Aulisi EF; Armonda RA
    J Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 137(6):1831-1838. PubMed ID: 35535843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy-a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.
    Gerstl JVE; Rendon LF; Burke SM; Doucette J; Mekary RA; Smith TR
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Dec; 164(12):3075-3090. PubMed ID: 35593924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical significance of positive cranial bone flap cultures and associated risk of surgical site infection after craniotomies or craniectomies.
    Chiang HY; Steelman VM; Pottinger JM; Schlueter AJ; Diekema DJ; Greenlee JD; Howard MA; Herwaldt LA
    J Neurosurg; 2011 Jun; 114(6):1746-54. PubMed ID: 21375380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subgaleal drains may be associated with decreased infection following autologous cranioplasty: a retrospective analysis.
    Spake CSL; Beqiri D; Rao V; Crozier JW; Svokos KA; Woo AS
    Br J Neurosurg; 2024 Aug; 38(4):877-883. PubMed ID: 34751075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Autoclaving of Autologous Bone is a Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection After Cranioplasty.
    Wui SH; Kim KM; Ryu YJ; Kim I; Lee SJ; Kim J; Kim C; Park S
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jul; 91():43-9. PubMed ID: 27032525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cranioplasty with Autologous Bone Flaps Cryopreserved with Dimethylsulphoxide: Does Tissue Processing Matter.
    Mirabet V; García D; Roca A; Quiroz AR; Antón J; Rodríguez-Cadarso M; Ocete D; Aranda L; Melero A; Guillot AJ; Yagüe N; Guillén I; Botella C
    World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():e582-e591. PubMed ID: 33556597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications and Failures of Autologous Heterotopic Cranial Bone versus Alloplastic Cranioplasties.
    Oberoi MK; Mirzaie S; Huang KX; Caprini RM; Hu VJ; Dejam D; Ge S; Cronin BJ; Pfaff MJ; Lee JC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Oct; 154(4):757e-772e. PubMed ID: 37749784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complications After In Vivo and Ex Vivo Autologous Bone Flap Storage for Cranioplasty: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature.
    Corliss B; Gooldy T; Vaziri S; Kubilis P; Murad G; Fargen K
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 96():510-515. PubMed ID: 27647038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.