175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38428255)
21. Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms.
Schaffter T; Buist DSM; Lee CI; Nikulin Y; Ribli D; Guan Y; Lotter W; Jie Z; Du H; Wang S; Feng J; Feng M; Kim HE; Albiol F; Albiol A; Morrell S; Wojna Z; Ahsen ME; Asif U; Jimeno Yepes A; Yohanandan S; Rabinovici-Cohen S; Yi D; Hoff B; Yu T; Chaibub Neto E; Rubin DL; Lindholm P; Margolies LR; McBride RB; Rothstein JH; Sieh W; Ben-Ari R; Harrer S; Trister A; Friend S; Norman T; Sahiner B; Strand F; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; ; Mackey L; Cahoon J; Shen L; Sohn JH; Trivedi H; Shen Y; Buturovic L; Pereira JC; Cardoso JS; Castro E; Kalleberg KT; Pelka O; Nedjar I; Geras KJ; Nensa F; Goan E; Koitka S; Caballero L; Cox DD; Krishnaswamy P; Pandey G; Friedrich CM; Perrin D; Fookes C; Shi B; Cardoso Negrie G; Kawczynski M; Cho K; Khoo CS; Lo JY; Sorensen AG; Jung H
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e200265. PubMed ID: 32119094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced 2D mammography in everyday clinical use.
Neeter LMFH; Raat HPJ; Meens-Koreman SD; van Stiphout RSA; Timmermans SMEC; Duvivier KM; Smidt ML; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ; Lobbes MBI
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22224. PubMed ID: 34782698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of deep learning to establish a diagnostic model of breast lesions using two-dimensional grayscale ultrasound imaging.
Zhang N; Li XT; Ma L; Fan ZQ; Sun YS
Clin Imaging; 2021 Nov; 79():56-63. PubMed ID: 33887507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Deep learning performance for detection and classification of microcalcifications on mammography.
Pesapane F; Trentin C; Ferrari F; Signorelli G; Tantrige P; Montesano M; Cicala C; Virgoli R; D'Acquisto S; Nicosia L; Origgi D; Cassano E
Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Nov; 7(1):69. PubMed ID: 37934382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.
Watanabe AT; Lim V; Vu HX; Chim R; Weise E; Liu J; Bradley WG; Comstock CE
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):625-637. PubMed ID: 31011956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reversal of the hanging protocol of Contrast Enhanced Mammography leads to similar diagnostic performance yet decreased reading times.
van Geel K; Kok EM; Krol JP; Houben IPL; Thibault FE; Pijnappel RM; van Merriënboer JJG; Lobbes MBI
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():62-68. PubMed ID: 31307654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
Liu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Luo R; Wu H; Wu C; Zhang H; Tan W; Yin H; Wang D
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5902-5912. PubMed ID: 33496829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System.
Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Krupinski E; Mordang JJ; Schilling K; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 30457482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Conventional Imaging in Women with Dense Breasts.
Moffa G; Galati F; Maroncelli R; Rizzo V; Cicciarelli F; Pasculli M; Pediconi F
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jul; 13(15):. PubMed ID: 37568883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Pinto MC; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Pedersen K; Hofvind S; Wicklein J; Kappler S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):529-536. PubMed ID: 34227882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Artificial intelligence computer-aided detection enhances synthesized mammograms: comparison with original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in an experimental setting.
Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
Breast Cancer; 2023 Jan; 30(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 36001270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images.
Perek S; Kiryati N; Zimmerman-Moreno G; Sklair-Levy M; Konen E; Mayer A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 30367322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast masses with rim enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: morphological and enhancement features for diagnosis and differentiation of benign and malignant.
Wen C; Wang S; Ma M; Xu Z; Zeng F; Zeng H; Liao X; He Z; Xu W; Chen W
Br J Radiol; 2024 May; 97(1157):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 38521539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Positive Predictive Values of Abnormality Scores From a Commercial Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Mammography.
Lee SE; Hong H; Kim EK
Korean J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 25(4):343-350. PubMed ID: 38528692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast cancer detection accuracy of AI in an entire screening population: a retrospective, multicentre study.
Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Graumann O; Nielsen M; Lång K; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Rasmussen BSB
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Dec; 23(1):127. PubMed ID: 38124111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
