These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3842844)

  • 1. A case study of central processing following long-standing unilateral conductive hearing loss.
    Anderson KL
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 3842844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children with minimal conductive hearing impairment: speech comprehension in noise.
    Keogh T; Kei J; Driscoll C; Khan A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19451707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural speech discrimination under noise in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kumar KV; Rao AB
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Oct; 59(10):932-6. PubMed ID: 3190620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition in patients after successful surgery for unilateral congenital ear anomalies.
    Snik FM; Teunissen B; Cremers WR
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Aug; 104(8 Pt 1):1029-34. PubMed ID: 8052068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
    Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Odds of demonstrating auditory processing abnormality in the average older adult: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study.
    Golding M; Taylor A; Cupples L; Mitchell P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 16518141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
    Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech intelligibility in noise with ear protectors.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Riko K
    J Otolaryngol; 1980 Jun; 9(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 7001041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
    Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Syllabic stress (trochaic vs. spondaic) and speech thresholds in normal and hearing-impaired children.
    Martin FN; Checkles EM
    J Aud Res; 1983 Apr; 23(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 6679548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.
    Morris LG; Mallur PS; Roland JT; Waltzman SB; Lalwani AK
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mixed hearing loss in otosclerosis: indication for long-term follow-up.
    Ramsay HA; Linthicum FH
    Am J Otol; 1994 Jul; 15(4):536-9. PubMed ID: 8588610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.