These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38428551)

  • 1. In your skin? Somatosensory cortex is purposely recruited to situate but not simulate vicarious touch.
    Forster B; Abad-Hernando S
    Neuroimage; 2024 Apr; 289():120561. PubMed ID: 38428551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpersonal representations of touch in somatosensory cortex are modulated by perspective.
    Rigato S; Bremner AJ; Gillmeister H; Banissy MJ
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107719. PubMed ID: 31207259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossmodal influences on early somatosensory processing: interaction of vision, touch, and task-relevance.
    Dionne JK; Legon W; Staines WR
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 May; 226(4):503-12. PubMed ID: 23455852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional MRI Responses to Passive, Active, and Observed Touch in Somatosensory and Insular Cortices of the Macaque Monkey.
    Sharma S; Fiave PA; Nelissen K
    J Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 38(15):3689-3707. PubMed ID: 29540550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bodily self-relatedness in vicarious touch is reflected at early cortical processing stages.
    Adler J; Gillmeister H
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13465. PubMed ID: 31464351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vicarious touch: Overlapping neural patterns between seeing and feeling touch.
    Smit S; Moerel D; Zopf R; Rich AN
    Neuroimage; 2023 Sep; 278():120269. PubMed ID: 37423272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The attentional-relevance and temporal dynamics of visual-tactile crossmodal interactions differentially influence early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Popovich C; Staines WR
    Brain Behav; 2014 Mar; 4(2):247-60. PubMed ID: 24683517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A touching Sight: EEG/ERP correlates for the vicarious processing of affectionate touch.
    Schirmer A; McGlone F
    Cortex; 2019 Feb; 111():1-15. PubMed ID: 30419352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vicarious experiences and detection accuracy while observing pain and touch: The effect of perspective taking.
    Vandenbroucke S; Crombez G; Loeys T; Goubert L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1781-93. PubMed ID: 25832191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential involvement of somatosensory and interoceptive cortices during the observation of affective touch.
    Ebisch SJ; Ferri F; Salone A; Perrucci MG; D'Amico L; Ferro FM; Romani GL; Gallese V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1808-22. PubMed ID: 20666597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transient inhibition of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disrupts attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Bolton DA; Staines WR
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1928-37. PubMed ID: 21439987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute aerobic exercise enhances attentional modulation of somatosensory event-related potentials during a tactile discrimination task.
    Popovich C; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 281():267-75. PubMed ID: 25549856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective rating of weak tactile stimuli is parametrically encoded in event-related potentials.
    Auksztulewicz R; Blankenburg F
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 33(29):11878-87. PubMed ID: 23864677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-touch modulates the somatosensory evoked P100.
    Hogendoorn H; Kammers M; Haggard P; Verstraten F
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 233(10):2845-58. PubMed ID: 26105753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prefrontal cortex and somatosensory cortex in tactile crossmodal association: an independent component analysis of ERP recordings.
    Ku Y; Ohara S; Wang L; Lenz FA; Hsiao SS; Bodner M; Hong B; Zhou YD
    PLoS One; 2007 Aug; 2(8):e771. PubMed ID: 17712419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Embodied empathy for tactile events: Interindividual differences and vicarious somatosensory responses during touch observation.
    Schaefer M; Heinze HJ; Rotte M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(2):952-7. PubMed ID: 22306799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical signatures of vicarious tactile experience in four-month-old infants.
    Rigato S; Banissy MJ; Romanska A; Thomas R; van Velzen J; Bremner AJ
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 35():75-80. PubMed ID: 28942240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modulation of somatosensory processing in dual tasks: an event-related brain potential study.
    Kida T; Kaneda T; Nishihira Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 216(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 22120159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abnormal visual experience during development alters the early stages of visual-tactile integration.
    Niechwiej-Szwedo E; Chin J; Wolfe PJ; Popovich C; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 May; 304():111-9. PubMed ID: 26896697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interaction between felt touch and tactile consequences of observed actions: an action-based somatosensory congruency paradigm.
    Deschrijver E; Wiersema JR; Brass M
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1162-72. PubMed ID: 26152577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.