These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38429951)
1. Accuracy of linear measurements for implant planning based on low-dose cone beam CT protocols: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Carneiro ALE; Reis INR; Bitencourt FV; Salgado DMRA; Costa C; Spin-Neto R Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2024 Apr; 53(4):207-221. PubMed ID: 38429951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review. Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of probing, ultrasound and cone-beam CT scans for determining the buccal bone plate dimensions around oral implants - A systematic review. Dhondt R; Quirynen M; Tarce M; Teughels W; Temmerman A; Jacobs R J Periodontal Res; 2022 Aug; 57(4):754-767. PubMed ID: 35612409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the milliamperage settings on cone beam computed tomography imaging for implant planning. Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Queiroz de Freitas D; Campos PS; Watanabe PC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1364-8. PubMed ID: 25265127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review. Pelekos G; Acharya A; Tonetti MS; Bornstein MM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 May; 29(5):443-464. PubMed ID: 29578266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro. Sur J; Seki K; Koizumi H; Nakajima K; Okano T Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):e29-33. PubMed ID: 20598589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study. Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study. Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Geometric Accuracy of Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Dental CBCT Imaging Protocols in CAD/CAM-Guided Dental Implant Surgery. Unger S; Penzenstadler M; Husain AA; Wiedemeier D; Stadlinger B; Valdec S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):287-294. PubMed ID: 36525261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images. Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning. Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects. Peterson AG; Wang M; Gonzalez S; Covell DA; Katancik J; Sehgal HS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1296-1304. PubMed ID: 30427960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study. Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kilovoltage cone-beam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols. Kim S; Yoo S; Yin FF; Samei E; Yoshizumi T Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3648-59. PubMed ID: 20831072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]