These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3843007)

  • 1. [The 1978 TNM system for cancer of the breast: proposal for a modification].
    García Vilanova A; Company Serrano RA; Fuster Diana E; Checa Ayet F; Trullenque Peris R; García-Vilanova Comas A
    Rev Esp Oncol; 1985; 32(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 3843007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognosis of women with pT4b breast cancer: the significance of this category in the TNM system.
    Harms K; Wittekind C
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 18215492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic value of the 2002 TNM classification for breast carcinoma with regard to the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes.
    Duraker N; Caynak ZC
    Cancer; 2005 Aug; 104(4):700-7. PubMed ID: 16003773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score).
    Kudo M; Chung H; Osaki Y
    J Gastroenterol; 2003; 38(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 12673442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of Pittsburgh modified TNM criteria in prognosis prediction of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Chen J; Xu X; Ling Q; Wu J; Zheng SS
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Dec; 120(24):2200-3. PubMed ID: 18167202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biological significance of occult micrometastases in histologically negative axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients using the recent American Joint Committee on Cancer breast cancer staging system.
    Kahn HJ; Hanna WM; Chapman JA; Trudeau ME; Lickley HL; Mobbs BG; Murray D; Pritchard KI; Sawka CA; McCready DR; Marks A
    Breast J; 2006; 12(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 16848838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. T4 category revision enhances the accuracy and significance of stage III breast cancer.
    Güth U; Singer G; Langer I; Schötzau A; Herberich L; Holzgreve W; Wight E
    Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(12):2569-75. PubMed ID: 16688772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Prognosis of stage II and III breast cancer in women and critique of various aspects of the TNM system].
    García Vilanova A; Sancho Merle MF; Vázquez Albaladejo C; Fuster Diana E; Cano Peral J
    Rev Esp Oncol; 1980; 27(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 7255847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma.
    Rakha EA; El-Sayed ME; Lee AH; Elston CW; Grainge MJ; Hodi Z; Blamey RW; Ellis IO
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jul; 26(19):3153-8. PubMed ID: 18490649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Proposals for revisions of UICC TNM system (1997)--breast cancer].
    Yamamoto H; Morimoto T; Sano M; Fukuda M; Ueno E; Tajima T; Iwase T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Jun; 25(7):1087-93. PubMed ID: 9644326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. T4 breast cancer under closer inspection: a case for revision of the TNM classification.
    Güth U; Jane Huang D; Holzgreve W; Wight E; Singer G
    Breast; 2007 Dec; 16(6):625-36. PubMed ID: 17604172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical analysis of resectable breast cancer: a report of 6 263 cases].
    Yang MT; Rong TH; Huang ZF; Zeng CG; Long H; Fu JH; Lin P; Wang X; Wang SY; Wang X; Tang J
    Ai Zheng; 2005 Mar; 24(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 15757535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to improve the present TNM staging system.
    Hermanek P; Sobin LH; Wittekind C
    Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2189-91. PubMed ID: 10590354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The 2003 revised TNM staging system for breast cancer: results of stage re-classification on survival and future comparisons among stage groups.
    Escobar PF; Patrick RJ; Rybicki LA; Weng DE; Crowe JP
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 17058125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Locoregional recurrence of breast cancer: a retrospective comparison of treatment methods.
    Skowronek J; Piotrowski T
    Neoplasma; 2002; 49(6):426-31. PubMed ID: 12584593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Chinese classification system compared with TNM staging in prognosis of patients with primary hepatic carcinoma after resection.
    Sheng JM; Zhao WH; Wu FS; Ma ZM; Feng YZ; Zhou XR; Teng LS
    Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Nov; 4(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 16286262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinical importance of histology, grading and ploidies in primary breast cancer].
    Schlotter CM; Kropp S; Wichert S; Vogt U; Krieg V; Bosse U; Wassmann K
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(8):384-8. PubMed ID: 10486881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Use of TNM classification in clinical practice].
    Dunst J; Eberle E
    Zentralbl Chir; 1993; 118(9):560-2. PubMed ID: 8237153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term survival of patients with supraclavicular metastases at diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Olivotto IA; Chua B; Allan SJ; Speers CH; Chia S; Ragaz J
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Mar; 21(5):851-4. PubMed ID: 12610184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-small cell lung cancer with ipsilateral pulmonary metastases: prognosis analysis and staging assessment.
    Lee JG; Lee CY; Kim DJ; Chung KY; Park IK
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Mar; 33(3):480-4. PubMed ID: 18249000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.