These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38430381)
1. Thickness and design features of clinical cranial implants-what should automated methods strive to replicate? Fishman Z; Mainprize JG; Edwards G; Antonyshyn O; Hardisty M; Whyne CM Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2024 Apr; 19(4):747-756. PubMed ID: 38430381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards clinical applicability and computational efficiency in automatic cranial implant design: An overview of the AutoImplant 2021 cranial implant design challenge. Li J; Ellis DG; Kodym O; Rauschenbach L; Rieß C; Sure U; Wrede KH; Alvarez CM; Wodzinski M; Daniol M; Hemmerling D; Mahdi H; Clement A; Kim E; Fishman Z; Whyne CM; Mainprize JG; Hardisty MR; Pathak S; Sindhura C; Gorthi RKSS; Kiran DV; Gorthi S; Yang B; Fang K; Li X; Kroviakov A; Yu L; Jin Y; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Herout A; Alves V; Španěl M; Aizenberg MR; Kleesiek J; Egger J Med Image Anal; 2023 Aug; 88():102865. PubMed ID: 37331241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Li J; Krall M; Trummer F; Memon AR; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Jin Y; Chen X; Deutschmann H; Zefferer U; Schäfer U; Campe GV; Egger J Data Brief; 2021 Dec; 39():107524. PubMed ID: 34815988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic skull defect restoration and cranial implant generation for cranioplasty. Li J; von Campe G; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Wang E; Chen X; Zefferer U; Tödtling M; Krall M; Deutschmann H; Schäfer U; Schmalstieg D; Egger J Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102171. PubMed ID: 34340106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional deep learning to automatically generate cranial implant geometry. Wu CT; Yang YH; Chang YZ Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2683. PubMed ID: 35177704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deep learning for cranioplasty in clinical practice: Going from synthetic to real patient data. Kodym O; Španěl M; Herout A Comput Biol Med; 2021 Oct; 137():104766. PubMed ID: 34425418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deep learning-based framework for automatic cranial defect reconstruction and implant modeling. Wodzinski M; Daniol M; Socha M; Hemmerling D; Stanuch M; Skalski A Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Nov; 226():107173. PubMed ID: 36257198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The "springform" technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants. Pöppe JP; Spendel M; Schwartz C; Winkler PA; Wittig J Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Mar; 164(3):679-688. PubMed ID: 34873659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Warfare-related craniectomy defect reconstruction: early success using custom alloplast implants. Kumar AR; Bradley JP; Harshbarger R; Stevens F; Bell R; Moores L; Armonda R Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Mar; 127(3):1279-1287. PubMed ID: 21364428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Custom implant design for large cranial defects. Marreiros FM; Heuzé Y; Verius M; Unterhofer C; Freysinger W; Recheis W Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2217-2230. PubMed ID: 27358081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Features of modeling a polymer implant for closing a defect after decompressive craniotomy]. Okishev DN; Cherebylo SA; Konovalov AN; Chelushkin DM; Shekhtman OD; Konovalov NA; Okisheva EA; Kravchuk AD; Eliava SS Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2022; 86(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 35170273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional reconstruction of cranial defect using active contour model and image registration. Liao YL; Lu CF; Sun YN; Wu CT; Lee JD; Lee ST; Wu YT Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Feb; 49(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 21128121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided implant design for the restoration of cranial defects. Chen X; Xu L; Li X; Egger J Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):4199. PubMed ID: 28646207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skull reconstruction after resection of bone tumors in a single surgical time by the association of the techniques of rapid prototyping and surgical navigation. Anchieta MV; Salles FA; Cassaro BD; Quaresma MM; Santos BF Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1919-25. PubMed ID: 27167515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Back to the Roots: Reconstructing Large and Complex Cranial Defects using an Image-based Statistical Shape Model. Li J; Ellis DG; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Aizenberg MR; Kleesiek J; Egger J J Med Syst; 2024 May; 48(1):55. PubMed ID: 38780820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kodym O; Li J; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Chilamkurthy S; Egger J; Španěl M Data Brief; 2021 Apr; 35():106902. PubMed ID: 33997188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Research on three-dimensional skull repair by combining residual and informer attention]. Qin C; Zeng J; Zheng B; Zeng J; Zhai Y; Zhang W; Yan J Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 39(5):897-908. PubMed ID: 36310478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical report: Rapid intraoperative reconstruction of cranial implants using additively manufactured moulds. Beaulieu K; Alkins R; Ellis RE; Kunz M Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Sep; 234(9):1011-1017. PubMed ID: 32627709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer aided design of large-format prefabricated cranial plates. Dean D; Min KJ; Bond A J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):819-32. PubMed ID: 14600623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]