These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38430382)

  • 1. Parameter Identifiability in PDE Models of Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching.
    Ciocanel MV; Ding L; Mastromatteo L; Reichheld S; Cabral S; Mowry K; Sandstede B
    Bull Math Biol; 2024 Mar; 86(4):36. PubMed ID: 38430382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inference of protein kinetics by stochastic modeling and simulation of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments.
    Rapsomaniki MA; Cinquemani E; Giakoumakis NN; Kotsantis P; Lygeros J; Lygerou Z
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25273108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Parameter Inference from FRAP Data: an Analysis Motivated by Pattern Formation in the Drosophila Wing Disc.
    Lin L; Othmer HG
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Mar; 79(3):448-497. PubMed ID: 28101740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of biomolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters in living cells by inverse modeling.
    Sadegh Zadeh K; Montas HJ; Shirmohammadi A
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2006 Oct; 3():36. PubMed ID: 17034642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parameter estimation in fluorescence recovery after photobleaching: quantitative analysis of protein binding reactions and diffusion.
    Williamson DE; Sahai E; Jenkins RP; O'Dea RD; King JR
    J Math Biol; 2021 Jun; 83(1):1. PubMed ID: 34129100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mathematical model of actin filament turnover for fitting FRAP data.
    Halavatyi AA; Nazarov PV; Al Tanoury Z; Apanasovich VV; Yatskou M; Friederich E
    Eur Biophys J; 2010 Mar; 39(4):669-77. PubMed ID: 19921173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural identifiability analysis of age-structured PDE epidemic models.
    Renardy M; Kirschner D; Eisenberg M
    J Math Biol; 2022 Jan; 84(1-2):9. PubMed ID: 34982260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferences from FRAP data are model dependent: A subdiffusive analysis.
    Alexander AM; Lawley SD
    Biophys J; 2022 Oct; 121(20):3795-3810. PubMed ID: 36127879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ASAS-NANP symposium: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: The power of identifiability analysis for dynamic modeling in animal science:a practitioner approach.
    Muñoz-Tamayo R; Tedeschi LO
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37997927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DeepFRAP: Fast fluorescence recovery after photobleaching data analysis using deep neural networks.
    Wåhlstrand Skärström V; Krona A; Lorén N; Röding M
    J Microsc; 2021 May; 282(2):146-161. PubMed ID: 33247838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making Predictions Using Poorly Identified Mathematical Models.
    Simpson MJ; Maclaren OJ
    Bull Math Biol; 2024 May; 86(7):80. PubMed ID: 38801489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifiability analysis for stochastic differential equation models in systems biology.
    Browning AP; Warne DJ; Burrage K; Baker RE; Simpson MJ
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Dec; 17(173):20200652. PubMed ID: 33323054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of membrane-localized binding kinetics with FRAP.
    Dushek O; Das R; Coombs D
    Eur Biophys J; 2008 Jun; 37(5):627-38. PubMed ID: 18299825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of Active Transport by Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching.
    Ciocanel MV; Kreiling JA; Gagnon JA; Mowry KL; Sandstede B
    Biophys J; 2017 Apr; 112(8):1714-1725. PubMed ID: 28445762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theoretical model of mitotic spindle microtubule growth for FRAP curve interpretation.
    Omelyanchuk LV; Munzarova AF
    BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Feb; 11(Suppl 1):378. PubMed ID: 28466790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of binding mechanisms of nuclear proteins using confocal scanning laser microscopy and FRAP.
    Tsibidis GD; Ripoll J
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug; 253(4):755-68. PubMed ID: 18538796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A nonfitting method using a spatial sine window transform for inhomogeneous effective-diffusion measurements by FRAP.
    Orlova DY; Bártová E; Maltsev VP; Kozubek S; Chernyshev AV
    Biophys J; 2011 Jan; 100(2):507-16. PubMed ID: 21244847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of Protein Kinetics Using Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP).
    Giakoumakis NN; Rapsomaniki MA; Lygerou Z
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1563():243-267. PubMed ID: 28324613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of protein and lipid dynamics using confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP).
    Day CA; Kraft LJ; Kang M; Kenworthy AK
    Curr Protoc Cytom; 2012 Oct; Chapter 2():Unit2.19. PubMed ID: 23042527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.