BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38430675)

  • 1. Risk adaptive planning with biology-based constraints may lead to higher tumor control probability in tumors of the canine brain: A planning study.
    Radonic S; Schneider U; Besserer J; Meier VS; Rohrer Bley C
    Phys Med; 2024 Mar; 119():103317. PubMed ID: 38430675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using biologically based objectives to optimize boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning for brainstem tumors in dogs.
    Meier V; Besserer J; Rohrer Bley C
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2020 Jan; 61(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31600027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
    Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
    Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inverse and forward optimization of one- and two-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based treatment of concave-shaped planning target volumes: the case of prostate cancer.
    Corletto D; Iori M; Paiusco M; Brait L; Broggi S; Ceresoli G; Iotti C; Calandrino R; Fiorino C
    Radiother Oncol; 2003 Feb; 66(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 12648791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetric Evaluation of Incorporating Patient Geometric Variations Into Adaptive Plan Optimization Through Probabilistic Treatment Planning in Head and Neck Cancers.
    Liu Q; Liang J; Zhou D; Krauss DJ; Chen PY; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jul; 101(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 29976511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison.
    De Meerleer GO; Vakaet LA; De Gersem WR; De Wagter C; De Naeyer B; De Neve W
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jun; 47(3):639-48. PubMed ID: 10837946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment and quantification of patient set-up errors in nasopharyngeal cancer patients and their biological and dosimetric impact in terms of generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD), tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
    Boughalia A; Marcie S; Fellah M; Chami S; Mekki F
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 88(1050):20140839. PubMed ID: 25882689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voxel-Level BED Corrected Dosimetric and Radiobiological Assessment of 2 Kinds of Hybrid Radiotherapy Planning Methods for Stage III NSCLC.
    Wang H; Huang Y; Chen H; Shao Y; Duan Y; Feng A; Gu H; Ma X; Xu Z; Kong Q; Zhou Y
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221107966. PubMed ID: 35731648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intensity modulated radiation therapy dose painting for localized prostate cancer using ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography scans.
    Chang JH; Lim Joon D; Lee ST; Gong SJ; Anderson NJ; Scott AM; Davis ID; Clouston D; Bolton D; Hamilton CS; Khoo V
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):e691-6. PubMed ID: 22658218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Focal dose escalation for prostate cancer using
    Zamboglou C; Thomann B; Koubar K; Bronsert P; Krauss T; Rischke HC; Sachpazidis I; Drendel V; Salman N; Reichel K; Jilg CA; Werner M; Meyer PT; Bock M; Baltas D; Grosu AL
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 May; 13(1):81. PubMed ID: 29716617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating different radiotherapy treatment plans, in terms of critical organ scoring index, conformity index, tumor control probability, and normal tissue complication probability calculations in early glottic larynx carcinoma.
    Inal A; Duman E; Ozkan EE
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(3):485-493. PubMed ID: 32719255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
    Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation.
    Grills IS; Yan D; Martinez AA; Vicini FA; Wong JW; Kestin LL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Nov; 57(3):875-90. PubMed ID: 14529795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans.
    Liang X; Penagaricano J; Zheng D; Morrill S; Zhang X; Corry P; Griffin RJ; Han EY; Hardee M; Ratanatharathom V
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jan; 11():10. PubMed ID: 26800883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An integrated strategy of biological and physical constraints in biological optimization for cervical carcinoma.
    Feng Z; Tao C; Zhu J; Chen J; Yu G; Qin S; Yin Y; Li D
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 12(1):64. PubMed ID: 28376900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk-adaptive optimization: selective boosting of high-risk tumor subvolumes.
    Kim Y; Tomé WA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Dec; 66(5):1528-42. PubMed ID: 17126211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
    Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
    World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A split-organ delineation approach for dose optimisation for intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Chau RM; Leung SF; Kam MK; Cheung KY; Kwan WH; Yu KH; Chiu SK; Chan AT
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Mar; 20(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 18031999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Esophagus sparing with IMRT in lung tumor irradiation: an EUD-based optimization technique.
    Chapet O; Thomas E; Kessler ML; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep; 63(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 16111587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of prostate VMAT plans optimized using the photon and progressive resolution algorithm.
    Chow JCL; Jiang R; Xu L
    Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 31103251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.