157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38431159)
1. Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making Among Urology Applicants.
Peters CE; Seideman CA; Kauderer S; Gore JL; Holt SK; Mehta A; Singer EA; Tabakin AL; Thavaseelan S; Vemulakonda V; Posid T; Velez D
Urology; 2024 May; 187():49-54. PubMed ID: 38431159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes Among Society of Women in Urology Members Toward Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
Peters CE; Lee J; Holt SK; Wolff E; Gore JL; Seideman CA
Urology; 2023 Oct; 180():295-302. PubMed ID: 37390972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications in the Year After Abortion Access Changes.
Hammoud MM; Morgan HK; George K; Ollendorff AT; Dalrymple JL; Dunleavy D; Zhu M; Banks E; Akingbola BA; Connolly A
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2355017. PubMed ID: 38324311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The National Resident Matching Program Code of Conduct: What Is the Perceived Degree of Compliance During the Urology Match Process?
Sebesta EM; Lipsky MJ; Nunez M; Cooper KL; Badalato GM
Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():37-43. PubMed ID: 29935263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. #AUAMatch: The Impact of COVID-19 on Social Media Use in the Urology Residency Match.
Ho P; Margolin E; Sebesta E; Small A; Badalato GM
Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():50-56. PubMed ID: 34033828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding the Urology Program Directors Perspective on the Current Resident Selection Process: The Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Urology Program Directors.
Movassaghi M; Lemack GE; Badalato GM; Broderick G; Greene K; Ibeziako O; Mirza M; Murphy A; Thavaseelan S; Wolter C; Takacs E
J Surg Educ; 2023 Jun; 80(6):900-906. PubMed ID: 36914481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion restrictions and medical residency applications.
Mermin-Bunnell K; Traub AM; Wang K; Aaron B; King LP; Kawwass J
J Med Ethics; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38071579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A survey of pediatric urology fellowship applicants: past priorities to guide future possibilities.
Ernst M; Ebert K; Rehfuss A; McLeod D; Alpert S
J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Dec; 18(6):787.e1-787.e8. PubMed ID: 35780044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Editorial Comment on "Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making among Urology Applicants".
Griebling TL
Urology; 2024 May; 187():55. PubMed ID: 38490279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Editorial Comment on "Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making among Urology Applicants".
Hampson LA; Hacker EC
Urology; 2024 May; 187():56. PubMed ID: 38336133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Preference Signaling and Virtual Interviews: The New Urology Residency Match.
Carpinito GP; Badia RR; Khouri RK; Ganesan V; Kenigsberg AP; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
Urology; 2023 Jan; 171():35-40. PubMed ID: 36332703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Urology Applicant: An Analysis of Contemporary Urology Residency Candidates.
Lebastchi AH; Khouri RK; McLaren ID; Faerber GJ; Kraft KH; Hafez KS; Dauw CA; Bird VG; Stringer TF; Singla AK; Sorensen MD; Wessells H; Ambani SN
Urology; 2018 May; 115():51-58. PubMed ID: 29408686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision on retention of Indiana medical students for residency.
Hulsman L; Bradley PK; Caldwell A; Christman M; Rusk D; Shanks A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101164. PubMed ID: 37783276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision on Obstetrics and Gynecology Graduating Residents' Practice Plans.
Woodcock AL; Carter G; Baayd J; Turok DK; Turk J; Sanders JN; Pangasa M; Gawron LM; Kaiser JE
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 142(5):1105-1111. PubMed ID: 37769302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reply to Editorial Comment on "Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making among Urology Applicants" by Griebling.
Velez D; Seideman CA
Urology; 2024 May; 187():57. PubMed ID: 38521209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Urology Match and Postinterview Communication.
Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Kaplan A; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():44-51. PubMed ID: 29935262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the Female and Underrepresented Minority Medical Student Experience in the Urology Match: Where Do We Fall Short?
Wong D; Kuprasertkul A; Khouri RK; Ganesan V; Kenigsberg AP; Lemack GE
Urology; 2021 Jan; 147():57-63. PubMed ID: 33065172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors.
Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Srivastava A; Pandya SS; Kaplan A; Radadia KD; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
Urology; 2019 Jun; 128():23-30. PubMed ID: 30844386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importance of abortion training to United States Obstetrics and Gynecology residency applicants in 2023.
Cohen RH; Beasley A; Conageski C; Page-Ramsey SM; Alston MJ
Contraception; 2024 May; ():110479. PubMed ID: 38710354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anxiety and Depression Symptoms After the Dobbs Abortion Decision.
Thornburg B; Kennedy-Hendricks A; Rosen JD; Eisenberg MD
JAMA; 2024 Jan; 331(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 38261045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
